2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2016.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis on the fluidization dynamics of rodlike particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 compares the time-averaged porosity profiles with both experiments and CFD-DEM results reported in Muller et al [52] at two heights above the distributor plate: 16.4 and 31.2 mm. In general, the present results are comparable with the experimental data but slightly over-predict the porosity especially in the vicinity of the side walls, similar findings are also reported in other validation tests of CFD-DEM methods [54,55]. At the height of 16.4 mm, the maximum difference between the predicted values and the experimental values is within 20% relative to the experimental value.…”
Section: Cfd Solversupporting
confidence: 80%
“…5 compares the time-averaged porosity profiles with both experiments and CFD-DEM results reported in Muller et al [52] at two heights above the distributor plate: 16.4 and 31.2 mm. In general, the present results are comparable with the experimental data but slightly over-predict the porosity especially in the vicinity of the side walls, similar findings are also reported in other validation tests of CFD-DEM methods [54,55]. At the height of 16.4 mm, the maximum difference between the predicted values and the experimental values is within 20% relative to the experimental value.…”
Section: Cfd Solversupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The drag force is calculated using the scheme proposed by De Felice, which is widely used for spherical particles and nonspherical particles and expressed as: fd,i=0.125CDρfπdpi2εi2uivi()uiviεiχ where χ is empirical coefficient calculated as, χ = 3.7 − 0.65exp[−(1.5 − log 10 Re i ) 2 /2], Re i = ρ f d pi ε i | u i − v i |/ μ f , ρ f is fluid density, d pi is particle diameter, ε i is porosity, u i is fluid velocity, v i is particle translational velocity and C D is the drag coefficient which is obtained by the Hölzer and Sommerfeld drag force model given as: CD=8Re1ϕ+16Re1ϕ+3italicRe1ϕ3/4+0.42100.4logϕ0.21ϕ where ϕ is the sphericity of an ellipsoid defined as the ratio of surface area of a sphere being equivalent volume of the ellipsoid to the surface area of the ellipsoid, ϕ ⊥ is the crosswise sphericity, and ϕ ‖ is the lengthwise sphericity. More details of the two sphericity parameters can be referred to Zhou et al and Gan et al…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings from the previous studies suggest that the fluidization of nonspherical particles is complex as nonspherical particles are anisotropic which results in different particle behaviors and bubble dynamics . However, to date, little efforts have been made on how the bubble properties and dynamics vary with particle shape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case where the gas flow is not introduced into the system, only DEM simulation is utilised. For completeness, we only describe the key features of the simulation method as follows and further information could be found in Nan et al (2016).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%