2020
DOI: 10.3390/e22030363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis on Natural Convection Heat Transfer in a Single Circular Fin-Tube Heat Exchanger (Part 1): Numerical Method

Abstract: In this research, unsteady three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations are solved to simulate experiments with the Boussinesq approximation and validate the proposed numerical model for the design of a circular fin-tube heat exchanger. Unsteady time marching is proposed for a time sweeping analysis of various Rayleigh numbers. The accuracy of the natural convection data of a single horizontal circular tube with the proposed numerical method can be guaranteed when the Rayleigh number based on the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The errors of the results of the computational fluid dynamics presented in this paper against the correlation of Kang and Chang [9] are shown in Table 4. For D15-D18, the mean errors are limited to 18.5%, namely within the error levels reported in Part 1 [1]. However, for the limiting cases of D50 and D100, the errors tend to deviate to a greater extent because these diameter ratios do not fit within the correlation range of Kang and Chang [9].…”
Section: Expansion Of Correlationsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The errors of the results of the computational fluid dynamics presented in this paper against the correlation of Kang and Chang [9] are shown in Table 4. For D15-D18, the mean errors are limited to 18.5%, namely within the error levels reported in Part 1 [1]. However, for the limiting cases of D50 and D100, the errors tend to deviate to a greater extent because these diameter ratios do not fit within the correlation range of Kang and Chang [9].…”
Section: Expansion Of Correlationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These results are due to the fact that the computational data underpredict experimental data in Kang and Chang [9] by approximately 16% -20%. This reason has already been mentioned in Part 1 [1].…”
Section: Validity Of Correlationmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations