2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of water, ethylene glycol and nanofluid based radiator using CFD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we confirmed that this velocity condition complies with the indoor air-velocity range regarding thermal comfort (0.25-0.5 m/s). 53 This result is in parallel with the work of Bayatian et al 54 Their contaminant removal experiment through vertical laminar flow in a 3.95 × 2.35 × 2.65 m (W x D x H) wardroom, found that contaminants are reduced most effectively when the outdoor air of ∼0.3 m/s is supplied to the space.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Nevertheless, we confirmed that this velocity condition complies with the indoor air-velocity range regarding thermal comfort (0.25-0.5 m/s). 53 This result is in parallel with the work of Bayatian et al 54 Their contaminant removal experiment through vertical laminar flow in a 3.95 × 2.35 × 2.65 m (W x D x H) wardroom, found that contaminants are reduced most effectively when the outdoor air of ∼0.3 m/s is supplied to the space.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Delavari et al 15 performed CFD analysis on a car radiator using nanofluids (Al 2 O 3 water and Al 2 O 3 ethylene glycol) and reported the variation of local heat transfer coefficient and friction factor along the length of the fin, variation of nanoparticle concentration on Nusselt number, variation of nanoparticle concentration on friction factor and variation of inlet temperature on Nusselt number. Bejjam et al 16 numerically investigated the effect of water, ethylene glycol, and nanofluid on a car radiator and reported Nusselt number increased with increased volume concentration and volume flow rate and concluded that nanofluid‐based radiators performed better compared to the conventional coolant‐based radiator. Das et al 17 experimentally studied the functioning of graphene‐based nanofluid in thermosyphon at different inlet temperatures and at different inclinations and found that the graphene‐based nanofluid has a higher thermal conductivity than normal water by 29% at 218 K. Bharadwaj et al 18 performed computational fluid dynamic analysis on car radiator using graphene‐based nanofluids and found that heat transfer of automobile radiator increased when nanofluid was used because of the greater surface area of the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%