2018
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2018)141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of the unintegrated double gluon distribution

Abstract: We present detailed numerical analysis of the unintegrated double gluon distribution which includes the dependence on the transverse momenta of partons. The unintegrated double gluon distribution was obtained following the Kimber-Martin-Ryskin method as a convolution of the perturbative gluon splitting function with the collinear integrated double gluon distribution and the Sudakov form factors. We analyze the dependence on the transverse momenta, longitudinal momentum fractions and hard scales. We find that t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The qualitative argument here is that at large µ, with many partons present, the constraint of the longitudinal momentum is effective only when one of the considered partons takes a large momentum fraction, thus leaving significantly less of available phase space for the other parton. We remark that a qualitatively similar effect has been found for gluodynamics in [59][60][61].…”
Section: Numerical Results Of Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The qualitative argument here is that at large µ, with many partons present, the constraint of the longitudinal momentum is effective only when one of the considered partons takes a large momentum fraction, thus leaving significantly less of available phase space for the other parton. We remark that a qualitatively similar effect has been found for gluodynamics in [59][60][61].…”
Section: Numerical Results Of Evolutionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, there are important theoretical constraints on DPDs. On the one hand, there is the perturbative splitting of one parton into two [34][35][36][37][38][39]41,42,45,57,[65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76], which determines the behaviour of DPDs at small y and likewise puts constraints on DPDs depending on Δ. On the other hand, there are sum rules [77,78], which involve DPDs integrated over y (or evaluated at Δ = 0) and express the conservation of momentum and quark number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While for single-scale observables, such as total inclusive cross-section of some hard process with hard scale Q, the DPS contribution is always suppressed by powers of Λ 2 /Q 2 , where Λ is some typical hadronic scale, the DPS contribution can be comparable with Single Parton Scattering contribution for the differential distributions in some regions of phase space [3]. In the DPS picture, longitudinal and transverse-momentum correlations of small-x partons, participating in two independent hard scatterings, are quickly washed-out by effects of scale evolution of two-parton PDFs [4], so that double parton PDF effectively factorizes into a product of usual PDFs, leading to the "pocket-formula" description of DPS as:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TeV and √ S = 8 TeV. We use the unPDFs obtained by the KMR formula(3,4) from the LO collinear PDFs MSTW-2008[33] and the corresponding value of α s (M Z ) = 0.13939. We set the renormalization and factorization scales to µ R = for the central lines of our predictions, and we vary 1/2 < ξ < 2 to estimate the scale-uncertainty of our prediction, which is shown in the figures by the gray band for the curve corresponding to the sum of all contributions.In the Figs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%