2001
DOI: 10.1051/m2an:2001136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis of the Adiabatic Variable Method for the Approximation of the Nuclear Hamiltonian

Abstract: Abstract. Many problems in quantum chemistry deal with the computation of fundamental or excited states of molecules and lead to the resolution of eigenvalue problems. One of the major difficulties in these computations lies in the very large dimension of the systems to be solved. Indeed these eigenfunctions depend on 3n variables where n stands for the number of particles (electrons and/or nucleari) in the molecule. In order to diminish the size of the systems to be solved, the chemists have proposed many int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These numerical results developed in [8,10,11] are useful to determine where the superconductivity appears. The a posteriori error estimate we obtain is a prolongation of results by Larson [20], Bernardi-Métivet [5], Bernardi-Méti-vet-Verfürth [6], Maday-Turinici [22] or Verfürth [27] for another framework of operator with the Schrödinger operator with magnetic field and a Neumann magnetic boundary condition. We propose for this operator a better estimate than Verfürth [27] for −∇ · (A∇) + d and the a posteriori error estimate in Theorem 2.1 has the same order of convergence than for the a priori error estimate proposed by Babuška-Osborn [3] and recalled in Theorem 3.1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These numerical results developed in [8,10,11] are useful to determine where the superconductivity appears. The a posteriori error estimate we obtain is a prolongation of results by Larson [20], Bernardi-Métivet [5], Bernardi-Méti-vet-Verfürth [6], Maday-Turinici [22] or Verfürth [27] for another framework of operator with the Schrödinger operator with magnetic field and a Neumann magnetic boundary condition. We propose for this operator a better estimate than Verfürth [27] for −∇ · (A∇) + d and the a posteriori error estimate in Theorem 2.1 has the same order of convergence than for the a priori error estimate proposed by Babuška-Osborn [3] and recalled in Theorem 3.1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For the Schrödinger operator with magnetic field, [11] proves that the first eigenvectors are localized in the boundary ; therefore adaptative mesh refinement techniques seem to be appropriate to gain computation time and for this, we need local error estimates. In this spirit, we can quote works of Babuska [2,4], Bernardi-Métivet [5], Bernardi-Métivet-Verfürth [6], Larson [20] who proposes a posteriori error estimates for the Laplacian operator with Dirichlet boundary conditions which can be extended to operators such d i,j =1 ∂ x j a ij (x)∂ x i +b(x) with Robin boundary conditions, Maday-Turinici [22] who work more specifically about the nuclear hamiltonian. Some of these articles are based on the work of Verfürth [27] who tries to make a more systematic analysis of any problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%