2011
DOI: 10.3901/cjme.2011.04.618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis of Nozzle Clearance's Effect on Turbine Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at 100% nozzle opening, there is almost no difference in stage efficiency between the two models. Similar results were also shown in the researches of Hu et al, 16 indicating that the MFR and performance of turbine are seriously affected by nozzle endwall clearance at nozzle small openings, while at nozzle large openings, the clearance effect will be mitigated.…”
Section: Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, at 100% nozzle opening, there is almost no difference in stage efficiency between the two models. Similar results were also shown in the researches of Hu et al, 16 indicating that the MFR and performance of turbine are seriously affected by nozzle endwall clearance at nozzle small openings, while at nozzle large openings, the clearance effect will be mitigated.…”
Section: Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Hu et al [1] carried out a numerical investigation of the effect of nozzle clearance on turbine performance in a VGT turbine at different open conditions and indicated that the nozzle vane's endwall clearance leakage affects the turbine performance at small open conditions. Hideaki et al [2] found similar results and indicated that the leakage flow passing the clearance, due to the pressure difference between the suction side and pressure side, goes to the pressure side from the suction side.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al [4] analyzed the effect of nozzle clearances on turbine performance numerically. For this analysis the peak efficiency point ( / = 0.68) was chosen.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such change in direction of aerodynamic torque causes difficulty in controlling the operation of actuator. Further it is preferable to always have positive torque [4,6] acting on the vanes which ensures the safety against actuator failure. While a positive torque is preferred, it is also desired that the magnitude of torque or gas loads acting on the vane are minimum to avoid excessive bending stress.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%