2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:11(1738)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis of Mixed-Mode Fracture in Concrete Using Extended Fictitious Crack Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the fictitious crack model, there are four types of criteria commonly used in the mixed mode I-II fracture analyses of concrete, including stress-based, strain-based, energy-based and stress intensity factor (SIF)-based. By considering the extremely small size of the plastic zone at the fictitious crack tip, the principle tensile stress and maximum tangential stress criteria have been employed to determine the mixed mode I-II crack propagation in concrete [2][3][4][5]. Under the criteria, a crack begins to propagate when the principle tensile stress or maximum tangential stress at the tip of the crack is greater than the uniaxial tensile strength of concrete, and the crack propagates in the direction normal to the tensile stress at the crack tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the fictitious crack model, there are four types of criteria commonly used in the mixed mode I-II fracture analyses of concrete, including stress-based, strain-based, energy-based and stress intensity factor (SIF)-based. By considering the extremely small size of the plastic zone at the fictitious crack tip, the principle tensile stress and maximum tangential stress criteria have been employed to determine the mixed mode I-II crack propagation in concrete [2][3][4][5]. Under the criteria, a crack begins to propagate when the principle tensile stress or maximum tangential stress at the tip of the crack is greater than the uniaxial tensile strength of concrete, and the crack propagates in the direction normal to the tensile stress at the crack tip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carpinteri et al [15] and Shi [44] studied the behavior of concrete gravity dams subjected to hydraulic loading. The test set-up is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Cracks In Damsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FCM, FPZ is regarded as a macroscopic crack with normal cohesive stress σ acting on crack surface. In mode I concrete fracture, the initiation and propagation of cracks are triggered by tension stress (Dong et al 2016a) and cohesive stress in FPZ can be formulated with respect to crack opening displacement (COD), w. Accordingly, for mixed mode I-II fractures of concretes, cohesive stress in FPZ is formulated dividedly with respect to COD and crack slip displacement (CSD), ws (Gálvez et al 2002;Shi 2004;Dong et al 2017), because crack propagation is driven by tension stress σ and shear stress τ. Due to heterogeneity and asymmetry of different materials on the two sides of rock-concrete interfaces, mixed mode I-II interfacial fracture is dominant in these structures even under mode I loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a variety of τ-ws laws have been applied in the numerical simulations of crack propagation in concrete samples. Combining with extended fictitious crack model, Shi (2004) applied four τ-ws curves to explore the crack propagation behavior of mixed I-II mode fracture in concrete samples. The effects of different τ-ws curves on the fracture behavior of the samples were evaluated by comparing numerical and experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%