2012
DOI: 10.2514/1.c031670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Analysis of Effects of Leading-Edge Protuberances on Aircraft Wing Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent numerical simulations also confirmed the finding through higher-fidelity numerical methods [16,17,18,19,20]. These were accompanied by experiments on both full-and semi-span rectangular planforms in either wind [21,8,22] or water tunnels [23].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Subsequent numerical simulations also confirmed the finding through higher-fidelity numerical methods [16,17,18,19,20]. These were accompanied by experiments on both full-and semi-span rectangular planforms in either wind [21,8,22] or water tunnels [23].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…CFD simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent 17.0, which has been extensively used in various studies [17][18][19][20][21]. The 3D Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for the mean flow quantities were solved.…”
Section: Boundary Condition and Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CFD simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent 17.0 (ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA), which has been extensively used in various studies [9][10][11][12][13]. Steady and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations for the mean flow quantities were solved.…”
Section: Boundary Condition and Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%