2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of core-scale methane hydrate dissociation dynamics and multiphase flow in porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was attributed to the fact that S H was not uniformly formed in the core before the onset of depressurization, thus leading to discrepancies between the simulated and the measured T in the core. A number of more recent simulation studies [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] that analysed the same set of experiments led to improved matches of measurements and predictions of P, T and of the cumulative gas production (V T ) by implementing representative boundary conditions (i.e., an adiabatic boundary [41], a constant heat flux boundary [39], [43] and a constant T boundary [40], [42]and more reliable constitutive relationships (i.e., a permeability reduction model [43], a relative permeability model [41], and a kinetic rate model [39]. However, despite the improvements, discrepancies (sometimes significant) continued to exist.…”
Section: Site (Location)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was attributed to the fact that S H was not uniformly formed in the core before the onset of depressurization, thus leading to discrepancies between the simulated and the measured T in the core. A number of more recent simulation studies [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] that analysed the same set of experiments led to improved matches of measurements and predictions of P, T and of the cumulative gas production (V T ) by implementing representative boundary conditions (i.e., an adiabatic boundary [41], a constant heat flux boundary [39], [43] and a constant T boundary [40], [42]and more reliable constitutive relationships (i.e., a permeability reduction model [43], a relative permeability model [41], and a kinetic rate model [39]. However, despite the improvements, discrepancies (sometimes significant) continued to exist.…”
Section: Site (Location)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N H is the hydration number, in this study N H = 5.75, and ΔH is the standard enthalpy of methane hydrate dissociation (Chen et al, 2016). Note that hydrate dissociation is an endothermic process and only occurs at the hydrate particle surface, not within the bulk of the particle (Yang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Basic Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…这一分解动力学方程参考了Kim [14] 以及Clarke和 Boshnoi [15,16] [7,9,10] ; f eq 是平 衡温度下的逸度(Pa); f v 是实际气相中甲烷的逸度(Pa). 能量平衡:…”
Section: 海洋可燃冰储层开采数值分析和策略分析unclassified