2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of CFRP-confined concrete-filled stainless steel tubular stub columns under axial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tensile failure stress of CFRP is considered as 3612 MPa and the corresponding tensile failure strain is 0.016125 is used for this analytical investigation. Similar tensile failure stress and young's modulus were reported by Xu et al (2021). CFRP was chosen as the wrapped material partially/ fully, with a different number of layers of the CFPT columns.…”
Section: Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The tensile failure stress of CFRP is considered as 3612 MPa and the corresponding tensile failure strain is 0.016125 is used for this analytical investigation. Similar tensile failure stress and young's modulus were reported by Xu et al (2021). CFRP was chosen as the wrapped material partially/ fully, with a different number of layers of the CFPT columns.…”
Section: Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To analyze the ductility property of CFRP- CFDSTs, the ductility index (DI) (Wang et al, 2014; Xu et al, 2021) is used in this study, and its expression is:where δnormalu and δnormalA represent the axial shortening at the ultimate load and the axial shortening at the end of elastic stage, respectively.…”
Section: Research and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the contact between each component in the finite element part is ideal, in the actual production process of specimens, the CFRP could not completely adhere to the steel tube, which cannot be avoided and resulted in a certain gap between the steel tube and the CFRP. This gap results in separation and imperfect contact during loading, ultimately leading to lower test stiffness (Xu et al, 2021). Because the FE simulation of steel and concrete is based on homogeneous material, and the stress distribution is symmetrical, only the two ends of the outer steel tube showed local buckling in the CFDST.…”
Section: Verification Of Fe Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the proposed FE model, the constitutive model of the GFRP confined concrete subjected to compression was acquired from GB National Standard (2020), and the fibre-reinforced composite damage model of Hashin's criteria (Hashin and Rotem, 1973;Hashin, 1980) which was depicted in ABAQUS ( 2014) was used to model the inner and outer GFRP tubes. The 8-node linear brick element with reduced integration and hourglass control (C3D8R) was used to simulate the concrete, and the 4-node shell element with reduced integration (S4R) was used to model both the GFRP tube (Xu et al, 2021). Moreover, the ABAQUS/Standard with general static analysis step was used in the computational analysis, and the iteration solution technique of Newton-Raphson method was adopted in the analysis step (ABAQUS, 2014).…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Modelling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%