2017 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE 2017
DOI: 10.1109/emceurope.2017.8094648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of a reverberation chamber: Comparison between mechanical and source stirring techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analytical model of this chamber, all loss mechanisms are taken into account in terms of an equivalent finite conductibility of the walls [21]. More details on the RC characterization, including quality factor, working frequencies, the well stirred conditions and the performances of the multiple monopole source stirring technique can be found in [24–26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analytical model of this chamber, all loss mechanisms are taken into account in terms of an equivalent finite conductibility of the walls [21]. More details on the RC characterization, including quality factor, working frequencies, the well stirred conditions and the performances of the multiple monopole source stirring technique can be found in [24–26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of this approach is due to the presence of losses from different sources (walls, antennas, apertures, gaskets) that cannot be modelled as is. For this reason, a classical approach in RC chamber [22] modelling is used: the chamber's walls are simulated with an equivalent conductivity that permits us to obtain a chamber with the same Q-factor as the real one, for each frequency [25]. In particular, in our chamber, in order to obtain the same Q-factor, the conductivity of the walls is modelled with a value that is reduced by a factor of 10 with respect to the σ of the galvanized steel.…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%