1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-2275(97)00014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of 4 K pulse tube coolers: Part II. Performances and internal processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This overshoot is also present in other one-dimensional simulations of single-inlet pulse tubes, see [35], [82], [84]. The same effect was reported in [83] for a double-inlet pulse tube.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This overshoot is also present in other one-dimensional simulations of single-inlet pulse tubes, see [35], [82], [84]. The same effect was reported in [83] for a double-inlet pulse tube.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The conservation equations were solved using the finite volume method. In later works [81], [82] real gas properties were taken into account. In [35] basically the same model was used for studying a double-inlet pulse tube and good agreement with experimental data was reported.…”
Section: Different Modelling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical model used here is based on the work of Xu and Morie, on that of Panda et al for a GM cooler, and on that of Wang and Gifford for a pulse tube cooler, which was subsequently improved by considering various loss mechanisms . The governing differential equations are continuity, momentum, and energy equations for fluid domain, and energy equation for solid matrix and wall.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction factor: Cf={64Re5.2emfor laminar124Re+0.01431emfor turbulent-1.5em. The Nusselt number will be computed for laminar flow with isothermal BC as given by Boroujerdi et al, and turbulent flow as italicNu=0.023Re0.8Pr0.4. The axial‐conduction enhancement constant is ξ={17emfor laminar0.0220.25emRe0.75italicPr1.8emfor turbulent-1.4em. More details regarding the discretization procedure may also be found in previous studies in the case of a pulse tube cooler. Furthermore, the calculation of performance parameters, such as the cooling power and COP, is similar to that proposed by Zhu and Matsubara …”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oh here Re = puOh (9) The flow impedance factor z r of the regenerator is determined by the experimental data t141 and used in thermodynamic analysis of regenerator and pulse tubetiO. 15].…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%