1991
DOI: 10.1109/20.104929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis of 3D magnetostatic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TEAM problem 10 is treated as a magnetostatic problem (for details see [15]). In all computations we set the ACA accuracy e ¼ 10 À4 .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TEAM problem 10 is treated as a magnetostatic problem (for details see [15]). In all computations we set the ACA accuracy e ¼ 10 À4 .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called penalty term 27 1=m 7 · A in equation (1) indirectly enforces the Coulomb gauge and improves in a finite element approach the numerical stability of the solution of the coupled system of equations (Preis et al, 1991). Furthermore, the following boundary conditions are set:…”
Section: Hybrid Numerical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of ensuring the uniqueness of the magnetic vector potential and making the solution of the coupled system of equations numerically stable (Preis et al, 1991) the Coulomb gauge:…”
Section: Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the accuracy of the resulting field strength near protruding corners increases by using these elements (Mur, 1994). Anyhow, some studies have shown that edge elements are numerically less stable than nodal elements (Preis et al, 1991) and they are known to be less efficient in storage requirement and computation time by having the same accuracy than nodal elements (Mur, 1994;Jiang, B-N., et al, 1996). In addition some of the expressed problems, especially the discontinuities at almost flat material boundaries using nodal elements, can be softened by implementation of double layer nodes at these boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%