2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-009-1008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical analysis for the coating thickness prediction in continuous hot-dip galvanizing

Abstract: Gas wiping is a decisive operation in the hot-dip galvanizing process. Especially, it has a crucial influence on the thickness and uniformity of coating film, but may be subsequently responsible for splashing. To date, the number of fundamental studies on the jet structure impinging on a vertical moving strip for various nozzle systems has not been sufficient to draw any meaningful conclusion. In this connection, at first, to confirm the validation of numerical analysis, the impinging jet pressure on the surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a growth has been shown in previous studies. 3,[8][9][10]19,20) In order to find out such a growth at far downstream, the computational domain in the longitudinal direction is extended up to 90 mm, and the same grid spacing and time step have been used. Table 1 shows the computational results for computed film thickness averaged over the transverse direction at various y-locations and the standard deviation of the fluctuating film thickness over the transverse direction.…”
Section: Computational Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a growth has been shown in previous studies. 3,[8][9][10]19,20) In order to find out such a growth at far downstream, the computational domain in the longitudinal direction is extended up to 90 mm, and the same grid spacing and time step have been used. Table 1 shows the computational results for computed film thickness averaged over the transverse direction at various y-locations and the standard deviation of the fluctuating film thickness over the transverse direction.…”
Section: Computational Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the GMM rod (9) occurs a corresponding deformation and displace- As shown in Figure 3, according to the selection and test of the magnetostrictive actuator, the mechanical structure of the braking part of the magnetostrictive disc brake was further designed. The brake contains the giant-magnetostrictive actuator (3), which consists of the outer shell (7), the winding frame and coil (8), GMM rod (9) and end cover (10) (which also includes a retightening spring applying a retightening force and a magnetic yoke sealing magnetic circuit). When the giant-magnetostrictive actuator receives the braking signal, the winding frame coil (8) passes a current and generates the corresponding magnetic field.…”
Section: Magnetostrictive Disc Brake Structure Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chihoon Jo et al proposed a clamping force control algorithm considering friction characteristics and clamping force estimation for the clamping force control problem of a planetary reducer type EMB, which has a good control effect [9]. Soon-Bum Kwon and Y. H. Ki et al proposed their own algorithms for an EMB system to estimate the clamping force [10,11]. Chihoon Jo et al not only estimated the clamping force for an EMB system but also designed the clamping force control algorithm [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, there is no appropriate alternative to calculate the distributions of the wall jet pressure and the shear stress at present. Also the film thickness is so thin (around below 10 µm) [14], that it was assumed that the impinging wall jet pressure and the wall shear stress without the liquid film is equal to the value with liquid film. It is a validation of the previous assumption which is verified by the comparison of distributions in impinging wall jet pressure and the wall shear stress with the distributions for the case of the liquid film.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%