Numerical Analysis and Strength Evaluation of an Exposed River Crossing Pipeline with Casing Under Flood Load

Abstract

Pipelines in service always experience complicated loadings induced by operational and environmental conditions. Flood is one of the common natural hazard threats for buried steel pipelines. One exposed river crossing X70 gas pipeline induced by flood erosion was used as a prototype for this study. A mechanical model was established considering the field loading conditions. Morison equations were adopted to calculate distributional hydrodynamic loads on spanning pipe caused by flood flow. Nonlinear soil constraint on pipe was considered using discrete nonlinear soil springs. An explicit solution of bending stiffness for pipe segment with casing was derived and applied to the numerical model. The von Mises yield criterion was used as failure criteria of the X70 pipe. Stress behavior of the pipe were analyzed by a rigorous finite element model established by the general-purpose Finite-Element package ABAQUS, with 3D pipe elements and pipe-soil interaction elements simulating pipe and soil constraints on pipe, respectively. Results show that, the pipe is safe at present, as the maximum von Mises stress in pipe with the field parameters is 185.57 MPa. The critical flow velocity of the pipe is 5.8 m/s with the present spanning length. The critical spanning length of the pipe is 467 m with the present flow velocity. The failure pipe sections locate at the connection point of the bare pipe and the pipe with casing or the supporting point of the bare pipe on riverbed.Keywords finite element analysis, river crossing, buried X70 pipe, flood load, pipe soil interaction Period. Polytech. Civil Eng.X. Liu, H. Zhang et al.

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Traffic Load on the Mechanical Characteristics of HDPE Double-Wall Corrugated Pipe

“…Previous studies have focused on the circumferential stress and changes in the diameter of the flexible pipe to indicate the deformation of the pipe [9,16,23,51]. Compared with the real stress, the von-Mises stress comprehensively considers the deformation of materials in multiple directions, and the assessment of the ductile failure of pipes is more accurate; thus, it is reasonable to take the Von-Mises stress as a parameter that indicates the deformation of the pipe [52][53][54]. When the corrugated pipe is simplified as a straight-walled pipe, the circumferential and axial stress distribution of a particular section of the corrugated pipe cannot be obtained, so the Von-Mises stress is more suitable than the real stress to define the deformation of the pipe.…”

Stress and Deformation Analysis of Buried Gas Pipelines Subjected to Buoyancy in Liquefaction Zones

“…For buried pipelines, the principal stresses are the axial stress σ ax , radial stress σ ra and hoop stress σ ho , respectively. The radial stress is always negligible due to the fact pipes are all thin walled vessels [20], the von Mises stress in a pipe can be obtained as:…”

“…Three dimensional pipe elements (PIPE31) were utilized to model the pipeline. A fine mesh with element size of 0.1 m was set for pipelines near and in the liquefaction zone, as large pipe stress appears in these pipe segments [20]. A coarse mesh with element size of 1 m was set for pipelines far away from the liquefaction zone.…”

“…Neupane et al [18,19] investigated the effects of pipe materials' plastic anisotropy on the local deformation responses of high strength steel pipelines under environmental bending loads via series of finite element models. Liu et al [20] studied the stress and deformation response of pipelines with casing under distributed water loads using nonlinear finite element models. Lin et al [21] investigated the uplift behavior of pipelines crossing liquefaction areas through finite element analysis.…”