2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical algorithm for the standard pairing problem based on the Heine–Stieltjes correspondence and the polynomial approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This limits the applicability of the methodology to relatively small systems. However, it has been shown recently that the set of Gaudin-Richardson equations for the standard pairing case can be solved relatively easily by using the extended Heine-Stieltjes polynomial approach [229,249]. Since solutions of the standard pairing model can be obtained from zeros of the associated extended HeineStieltjes polynomials, the approach can be applied to study the model with more pairs over a larger number of single-particle levels.…”
Section: Seniority Scheme and Exact Pairing Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limits the applicability of the methodology to relatively small systems. However, it has been shown recently that the set of Gaudin-Richardson equations for the standard pairing case can be solved relatively easily by using the extended Heine-Stieltjes polynomial approach [229,249]. Since solutions of the standard pairing model can be obtained from zeros of the associated extended HeineStieltjes polynomials, the approach can be applied to study the model with more pairs over a larger number of single-particle levels.…”
Section: Seniority Scheme and Exact Pairing Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(36) also suggests an alternative way of solving the equations. From the RG equations it is possible to obtain a Heine-Stieltjes equation for P (z), which can be used to numerically determine the polynomial in the monomial basis [18,39]. In this method it would not be necessary to start from the weak-coupling limit when numerically solving the equations, and only two coupled matrix equations need to be solved.…”
Section: Inverting the Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ζ is an additional quantum number introduced to label the ζ-th excitation state, the explicit operator form of S + (x (ζ) µ ) is still given by (8), which was also used in [20][21][22]. Using (6), (9), and (11), we can directly check that…”
Section: The Model and Its General Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, solutions of (20) or (21) can not be obtained easily as those in the standard pairing case shown in [7,8].…”
Section: The Model and Its General Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation