2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0024850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: Individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.

Abstract: An assessment of graph literacy distinguished individuals who are best informed with graphical representations of statistical information from those who are better informed with numerical representations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
154
4
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
154
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We used circles to represent the number of terror suspects because previous research (Gaissmaier et al, 2012;Stone, Yates, & Parker, 1997) did not find differences in effects of arrays with faces compared to more abstract symbols. For half of the participants, black circles represented the terror suspects who were not correctly identified by the technique, and white circles were used to represent this number for the other half.…”
Section: Design and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used circles to represent the number of terror suspects because previous research (Gaissmaier et al, 2012;Stone, Yates, & Parker, 1997) did not find differences in effects of arrays with faces compared to more abstract symbols. For half of the participants, black circles represented the terror suspects who were not correctly identified by the technique, and white circles were used to represent this number for the other half.…”
Section: Design and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El grupo de jóvenes con bajas habilidades gráficas incluye a aquellos participantes con 8 respuestas correctas o menos (n= 62, 51%), mientras que el de jóvenes con altas habilidades gráficas incluye a los participantes con 9 respuestas correctas o más (n= 59, 49%). El grupo de mayores con bajas habilidades gráficas incluye a aquellos participantes con 7 respuestas correctas o menos (n= 66, 49%), mientras que el grupo de mayores con altas habilidades gráficas incluye a quienes obtuvieron 8 respuestas correctas o más (n= 70, 51%; véase Gaissmaier et al, 2012; para un procedimiento similar).…”
Section: Método Participantesunclassified
“…Las personas también difieren en su nivel de habilidades gráficas , es decir, muestran distintos niveles en su capacidad para comprender y utilizar la información presentada visualmente-una habilidad que es independiente de las habilidades numéricas (Gaissmaier et al, 2012). En concreto, varios trabajos recientes han puesto de manifiesto que los formatos visuales son más beneficiosos para aquellas personas con niveles moderados o relativamente altos en sus habilidades gráficas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Based on previous studies, graphical representation of health related information is the most preferred and attractive method for patients compared with numerical/ tabular display [43,44]. It is also an effective method of communicating medical risk information [45] that results in better comprehension because of attracting the patient attention and extracting better information with less effort [38].…”
Section:  Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%