Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780199584055.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
737
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(737 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
737
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two review authors (ON and BK) independently assessed each study report for risk of bias by making judgements on the following questions according to the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011). A third review author (HA) independently assessed risk of bias to ensure agreement.…”
Section: Assessment Of Risk Of Bias In Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two review authors (ON and BK) independently assessed each study report for risk of bias by making judgements on the following questions according to the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011). A third review author (HA) independently assessed risk of bias to ensure agreement.…”
Section: Assessment Of Risk Of Bias In Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two review authors (HW, TD or SW) will independently assess risk of bias for each study using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011). We will resolve any disagreement by discussion or by involving a third assessor (MR).…”
Section: Assessment Of Risk Of Bias In Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we identify trials with more than two arms we will pool results using the methods set out in the Handbook (Higgins 2011) to avoid double-counting.…”
Section: Trials With More Than Two Armsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any disagreements will be resolved by a third author (FB). We will include a risk of bias table as recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011). The judgements 'low risk', 'high risk' and 'unclear risk' will be used in the table to determine bias.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will undertake subgroup analysis to examine possible clinical variability when the I 2 statistic is less than 50% but heterogeneity remains statistically significant. We will analyse outcome data from trial populations rather than individuals in order to explain possible sources of variability ( Higgins 2011). …”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%