Number of subjects required in common study designs for functional GABA magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the human brain at 3 Tesla

Abstract

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a research tool for measuring the concentration of metabolites such as γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate in the brain. MEGA‐PRESS has been the preferred pulse sequence for GABA measurements due to low physiological GABA concentrations, hence low signal. To compensate, researchers incorporate long acquisition durations (7–10 min) making functional measurements of this metabolite challenging. Here, the acquisition duration and sample sizes required to detect specific concentration changes in GABA using MEGA‐PRESS at 3 T are presented for both between‐groups and within‐session study designs. 75 spectra were acquired during rest using MEGA‐PRESS from 41 healthy volunteers in 6 different brain regions at 3 T with voxel sizes between 13 and 22 cm3. Between‐group and within‐session variance was calculated for different acquisition durations and power calculations were performed to determine the number of subjects required to detect a given percentage change in GABA/NAA signal ratio. Within‐subject variability was assessed by sampling different segments of a single acquisition. Power calculations suggest that detecting a 15% change in GABA using a 2 min acquisition and a 27 cm3 voxel size, depending on the region, requires between 8 and 93 subjects using a within‐session design. A between‐group design typically requires more participants to detect the same difference. In brain regions with suboptimal shimming, the subject numbers can be up to 4‐fold more. Collecting data for longer than 4 min in brain regions examined in this study is deemed unnecessary, as variance in the signal did not reduce further for longer durations.

A multimodal study of the effects of tDCS on dorsolateral prefrontal and temporo‐parietal areas during dichotic listening

“…The inconsistent results are likely to arise from differences in stimulation intensity and electrode location, for instance. However, spurious findings with small samples also constitute a problem: some tDCS/spectroscopy studies have sample sizes around n = 10, which is plainly underpowered as recently demonstrated (Sanaei Nezhad et al., 2020).…”

Sequential Finger-tapping Learning Mediated by the Primary Motor Cortex and Fronto-parietal Network: A Combined MRI-MRS Study

“…A higher SNR that increases linearly with the magnetic eld strength enables more accurate detection of weak signals from neurotransmitters in smaller voxels and with shorter measurement times 26 . Neurotransmitters were measured within M1 using a voxel size of 8 cm 3 (2×2×2) at 7T in this study; however, a voxel size of 27 cm 3 (3×3×3) was selected at 3T 27,28 . The 3T MRS is relatively insensitive to subtle changes in neurotransmitters underscoring cognitive functions due to large MRS voxel sizes 29 .…”

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Modulates GABAergic Activity In Neurofibromatosis 1

“…T2-weighted images were acquired at the rst visit (after the T1 image) and reviewed by a paediatric neuroradiologist (SS) to rule out NF1 associated tumours. The sample size of 30 participants in this study, powered on the expected change of 20% in GABA following tDCS based on our previous work (24).…”