2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Number of consumers necessary for survival analysis estimations based on each consumer evaluating a single sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consumers were asked to reply to the following question in a dichotomous way (yes or no): ''Would you normally consume this product?''. These answers were used to calculate the oligofructose concentration to be added to the yogurt formulation according to the survival analysis methodology (Libertino et al, 2011). The test was carried out under controlled conditions, with mineral water and cream crackers being made available to the consumers.…”
Section: Consumer Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consumers were asked to reply to the following question in a dichotomous way (yes or no): ''Would you normally consume this product?''. These answers were used to calculate the oligofructose concentration to be added to the yogurt formulation according to the survival analysis methodology (Libertino et al, 2011). The test was carried out under controlled conditions, with mineral water and cream crackers being made available to the consumers.…”
Section: Consumer Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended number of consumers necessary for survival analysis studies can be found in Hough et al . (2007) and Libertino et al . (2011).…”
Section: Methods Based On Product Failure or Consumers' Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because general appearance can be evaluated visually without sample destruction and during preliminary pilot experiment it was difficult to reach the same people every week for the study, the chosen methodology was current-status survival analysis based on the evaluation of a single sample [163,165].…”
Section: Evaluating the Effect Of Storage Conditions On The Shelf Lifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each consumer had to evaluate two (in 2014) and four samples (in 2015), only one time, and simply respond 'yes' or 'no' for every sample, according to their willingness to consume, based on general appearance only [165]. The number of weekly respondents was changed deliberately in order to increase the number of responses when the rejection rate was getting higher, close to final shelf life [162].…”
Section: Evaluating the Effect Of Storage Conditions On The Shelf Lifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation