2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Number of CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene of Japanese patients with primary ovarian insufficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference with respect to intermediate FMR1 between POF cases and controls (2.9% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.343). Similar prevalence has been drawn from Japanese POI cohorts (3.9%) [4], indicating that intermediate FMR1 does not contribute to POF in Chinese either [8], [21]. However, in some Caucasian studies the effect of intermediate FMR1 on ovarian function was controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference with respect to intermediate FMR1 between POF cases and controls (2.9% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.343). Similar prevalence has been drawn from Japanese POI cohorts (3.9%) [4], indicating that intermediate FMR1 does not contribute to POF in Chinese either [8], [21]. However, in some Caucasian studies the effect of intermediate FMR1 on ovarian function was controversial.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The premutation frequency was 1.6% in the only reported Japanese study [4], and 0.9% in the smaller Chinese study [12]. Therefore, FMR1 premutation seems to be an uncommon explanation for POF in Han Chinese.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These alleles have also been suggested to contribute to the etiology of disorders associated with parkinsonism (Loesch et al, 2007, 2009; Hall et al, 2011; Trost et al, 2013). Some reports have also linked these alleles to ovarian dysfunction (Bretherick et al, 2005; Bodega et al, 2006; Streuli et al, 2009; Ishizuka et al, 2011; Karimov et al, 2011; Pastore et al, 2012; Barasoain et al, 2013) although others have found no such association (Bennett et al, 2010; Voorhuis et al, 2013; Murray et al, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%