2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Number line estimation and mental addition: Examining the potential roles of language and education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, studies are needed to investigate the influence of instruction type on number line placements and, in particular, to what extent instruction with respect to number line placements around the midpoint influences the shape of the number lines produced by the children (Ashcraft & Moore, 2012). Second, although various studies have investigated transitions of number line shapes using number line tasks of various scales (Ashcraft & Moore, 2012;Berteletti, Lucangeli, Piazza, Dehaene, & Zorzi, 2010;Laski & Yu, 2014;Slusser et al, 2013), a broader range of models to describe the shape of number lines of various scales should be used in order to gain insight into the development of number line placements in other scales than in the current study. Third, although a developmental account has been made in the current study, no strong causal inferences can be drawn from the longitudinal analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, studies are needed to investigate the influence of instruction type on number line placements and, in particular, to what extent instruction with respect to number line placements around the midpoint influences the shape of the number lines produced by the children (Ashcraft & Moore, 2012). Second, although various studies have investigated transitions of number line shapes using number line tasks of various scales (Ashcraft & Moore, 2012;Berteletti, Lucangeli, Piazza, Dehaene, & Zorzi, 2010;Laski & Yu, 2014;Slusser et al, 2013), a broader range of models to describe the shape of number lines of various scales should be used in order to gain insight into the development of number line placements in other scales than in the current study. Third, although a developmental account has been made in the current study, no strong causal inferences can be drawn from the longitudinal analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparing Chinese and Chinese-American children's number line estimation, Laski and Yu (2014) found that Chinese children's number line estimation was 1 to 2 years ahead of their Chinese-American counterparts, even though both groups of children were fluent in Chinese. Similar to Towse and colleagues, Laski and Yu (2014) thus concluded that the development of linearity could not be explained by differences in the counting systems alone.…”
Section: Improving Estimation Of Numerical Magnitudes 198mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on the relation between numerical language and mathematics performance, however, provides counter evidence as well. For example, Towse and colleagues (e.g., Muldoon, Simms, Towse, Menzies, & Yue, 2011;Towse, Muldoon, & Simms, 2015) and Laski and Yu (2014) provided evidence that differences in numerical language alone could not explain children's understanding of number and other mathematics performance. For example, in the study by Muldoon et al (2011), Chinese and Scottish children's numerical estimation and other indicators of mathematics performance were examined.…”
Section: Improving Estimation Of Numerical Magnitudes 198mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more recent study, the roles of language and education in relation to number line estimation and simple arithmetic skills (addition) were investigated on two groups of children: Chinese groups which consisted of 41 kindergarteners and 31 second graders, and Chinese American groups made up of 42 kindergarteners and 20 second graders around the ages of 5 to 8 years (Laski & Yu, 2014). The Chinese children were tested in their native language, while the Chinese Americans were tested in English (though noted to be fluent in both languages).…”
Section: Number Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%