2020
DOI: 10.3989/egeol.43621.545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuevos datos sobre las faunas marinas del Eoceno medio-superior de Navarra (área surpirenaica occidental). Revisión de los fósiles de la colección Ruiz de Gaona

Abstract: Durante el Eoceno el área pirenaica pudo desempeñar un papel importante como encrucijada paleobiogeográfica entre los dominios del Tetis occidental y el Atlántico norte. Sin embargo, sus faunas marinas están todavía poco documentadas. En este trabajo se presentan los resultados de un primer estudio sobre los macrofósiles marinos del Eoceno medio–superior (Luteciense–Bartoniense–Priaboniense) de Navarra de la colección paleontológica de Máximo Ruiz de Gaona, investigador cuyos estudios sobre la geología y paleo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current state of knowledge, they do not appear to have reached the Atlantic. However, Astibia et al (2020) had attributed to the genus Metacrinus a few pluricolumnals from the Bartonian of the southwestern Pyrenean basin, which is connected with the northeastern Atlantic area, but this record needs confirmation. The Metacrininae remained in the western Mediterranean until the latest Miocene (Roux and Montenat 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current state of knowledge, they do not appear to have reached the Atlantic. However, Astibia et al (2020) had attributed to the genus Metacrinus a few pluricolumnals from the Bartonian of the southwestern Pyrenean basin, which is connected with the northeastern Atlantic area, but this record needs confirmation. The Metacrininae remained in the western Mediterranean until the latest Miocene (Roux and Montenat 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%