2008
DOI: 10.22201/ie.20074484e.2008.12.1.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuevas localidades en la distribución de murciélagos filostóminos (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) en Chiapas, México.

Abstract: We captured bats in natural protected areas in Chiapas, Mexico, including five individuals of the species Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris schmidtorum, and Vampyrum spectrum. We report new localities on the distribution of this three species, extending their distribution ranges.KEY WORDS: Chiapas, distribution, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris schmidtorum, Vampyrum spectrum.PALABRAS CLAVE: Chiapas, distribución, Macrophyllum macrophyllum, Micronycteris schmidtorum, Vampyrum spectrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These records show the importance of sampling in watercourses (and associated lagoons), in areas of plain landform , and in roosts close to potential foraging areas (e.g., culverts;Taddei 1975;Marques 1985). This directed effort will also help determine the extent to which the local rarity of this species, usually represented in surveys by just one specimen (e.g., Hernández-Mijangos et al 2008;Camargo et al 2009;Rocha et al 2010;Feijó et al 2015), is a matter of sampling artifact. Roost samplings usually result in more individuals being reported than net sampling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These records show the importance of sampling in watercourses (and associated lagoons), in areas of plain landform , and in roosts close to potential foraging areas (e.g., culverts;Taddei 1975;Marques 1985). This directed effort will also help determine the extent to which the local rarity of this species, usually represented in surveys by just one specimen (e.g., Hernández-Mijangos et al 2008;Camargo et al 2009;Rocha et al 2010;Feijó et al 2015), is a matter of sampling artifact. Roost samplings usually result in more individuals being reported than net sampling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%