Abstract:Meat consumption is associated with both public health risks and substantial CO 2 emissions. In a large-scale field-experiment, we applied four nudges to the digital menus in 136 hamburger restaurants. The nudges promoted vegetarian food purchases by either (1) changing the menu position of vegetarian food, or aligning vegetarian food with (2) a hedonic, taste-focused nudge, (3) the warm-glow effect, or (4) a descriptive social norm. These nudges were thus aimed to shift salience toward a certain goal or the s… Show more
“…Specifically, descriptive dynamic messages may hold more promise for reducing meat intake for three main reasons. First, the messages explicitly specify the behaviour required (reducing meat intake), contrasting previous usage of descriptive messages to influence meat consumption (e.g., Alblas et al, 2022;Reinholdsson et al, 2022). Second, the social norm message aligns with previous studies that supported the effects of descriptive messages to increase healthy food choices (e.g., Payne et al, 2015;Thomas et al, 2017).…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Findings showed that regardless of condition (e.g., descriptive social norm or control), high meat consumers reduced meat intake, while low meat consumers increased meat intake over two weeks. While this study was limited by self-report dietary measures which are prone to inaccuracies (Heitmann and Lissner, 1995), a further study in Swedish fast-food outlets which displayed a descriptive social norm message and measured the number of 'green' or vegetarian sales, also reported no effects on intake (Reinholdsson et al, 2022). However, a key limitation in both these studies was that the descriptive social norm message presented did not explicitly refer to reduced meat intake.…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, several studies have also reported no effects of a social norm message to reduce meat intake (Sparkman et al, 2020, study 4;Çoker et al, 2022;Reinholdsson et al, 2022). However, several other studies reported that exposure to a dynamic social norm message reduced meat purchases (Sparkman and Walton, 2017;Sparkman et al, 2020, studies 1 and 2).…”
A reduction in meat consumption is urgently needed to address multiple harms related to the environment, animal welfare, and human health. Social norm interventions have been found to be feasible and effective at shifting consumer behaviour, however, evidence related to meat reduction behaviour is limited – especially in naturalistic settings. Two social norm interventions were conducted at university food outlets in Aotearoa New Zealand and in the UK, to assess the effect of social norm messages on meat and meatless food purchases. Both interventions consisted of a week-long intervention phase during which descriptive dynamic social norm messages referring to reduced meat intake were displayed in the food outlets (study one and two) and via social media (study two). Meat and meatless food purchases during the interventions were compared to pre- and post-intervention weeks. Surveys were also conducted with a sub-group of customers to assess demographics, dietary habits, and awareness of the social norm message. In both studies, there was no significant effect of the social norm interventions on meat or meatless food purchases, and awareness of the norms message across both studies was low. These findings indicate that social norm interventions alone may be ineffective in encouraging meat reduction. Implications for interventions to reduce meat intake to support pro-environmental food choices are discussed.
“…Specifically, descriptive dynamic messages may hold more promise for reducing meat intake for three main reasons. First, the messages explicitly specify the behaviour required (reducing meat intake), contrasting previous usage of descriptive messages to influence meat consumption (e.g., Alblas et al, 2022;Reinholdsson et al, 2022). Second, the social norm message aligns with previous studies that supported the effects of descriptive messages to increase healthy food choices (e.g., Payne et al, 2015;Thomas et al, 2017).…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Findings showed that regardless of condition (e.g., descriptive social norm or control), high meat consumers reduced meat intake, while low meat consumers increased meat intake over two weeks. While this study was limited by self-report dietary measures which are prone to inaccuracies (Heitmann and Lissner, 1995), a further study in Swedish fast-food outlets which displayed a descriptive social norm message and measured the number of 'green' or vegetarian sales, also reported no effects on intake (Reinholdsson et al, 2022). However, a key limitation in both these studies was that the descriptive social norm message presented did not explicitly refer to reduced meat intake.…”
Section: Open Access Edited Bymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed, several studies have also reported no effects of a social norm message to reduce meat intake (Sparkman et al, 2020, study 4;Çoker et al, 2022;Reinholdsson et al, 2022). However, several other studies reported that exposure to a dynamic social norm message reduced meat purchases (Sparkman and Walton, 2017;Sparkman et al, 2020, studies 1 and 2).…”
A reduction in meat consumption is urgently needed to address multiple harms related to the environment, animal welfare, and human health. Social norm interventions have been found to be feasible and effective at shifting consumer behaviour, however, evidence related to meat reduction behaviour is limited – especially in naturalistic settings. Two social norm interventions were conducted at university food outlets in Aotearoa New Zealand and in the UK, to assess the effect of social norm messages on meat and meatless food purchases. Both interventions consisted of a week-long intervention phase during which descriptive dynamic social norm messages referring to reduced meat intake were displayed in the food outlets (study one and two) and via social media (study two). Meat and meatless food purchases during the interventions were compared to pre- and post-intervention weeks. Surveys were also conducted with a sub-group of customers to assess demographics, dietary habits, and awareness of the social norm message. In both studies, there was no significant effect of the social norm interventions on meat or meatless food purchases, and awareness of the norms message across both studies was low. These findings indicate that social norm interventions alone may be ineffective in encouraging meat reduction. Implications for interventions to reduce meat intake to support pro-environmental food choices are discussed.
“…In addition, a large-scale field study evaluated the effect of four different nudging strategies (i.e., normative goal, hedonic goal, a combination of normative and hedonic influence, and menu placement) to promote the purchase of green foods category (i.e., vegetarian and vegan options) in fast-food restaurants. Placement of the green category at the top of the menu led to a significant increase in the number of vegetarian and vegan dishes chosen [ 47 ]. As confirmation of this, among the implicit techniques applicable to the food choice environment, menu re-ordering was found to be the most effective in guiding diners’ decision making towards low-environmental impact dietary selections [ 35 ].…”
Creating a decision-making environment that promotes sustainable food choices is a priority for both the individual and society. This study aimed at encouraging plant-based menu choices by re-ordering the menu according to the carbon footprint values. The project was conducted in a grab-and-go eatery at a large United States public university, where students could order their meals choosing among different menu options that were customizable with various ingredients. The order of menu ingredients was changed twice: for five weeks, from the most to the least impactful in terms of carbon footprint; subsequently, for another five weeks the order was reversed. At both times, all sales data were recorded. A total of 279,219 and 288,527 items were selected, respectively, during the first and the second intervention. A significant association was found between menu re-ordering and customers’ choices for almost all food categories considered. Overall, despite beef choices not changing, results showed that students were more likely to choose low-carbon options when these were placed at the beginning, emphasizing that food selections were impacted by ingredient placement on the menu list. These findings highlight the need for a multi-level strategy focused on raising students’ awareness of the environmental impact of animal-based foods, particularly beef.
“…The results of the study showed that the taste message was most effective, leading to a significant 10 percent increase in plant-rich food sales compared to when no message was present. If scaled across all MAX Burger outlets, researchers estimated that this minor change to wording would translate to around 140,000 extra sales of green menu options over the course of a year (Reinholdsson et al 2023). Since this time, MAX Burger has continued to expand its range of tasty plant-rich options and ensure that these are framed as positive choices in its "Supreme Green" menu.…”
Diners increasingly say they want to eat healthier, more sustainable diets. But it can be hard to change old habits. WRI’s "Food Service Playbook for Promoting Sustainable Food Choices" gives food service operators the latest strategies for creating dining environments that empower consumers to choose sustainable, plant-rich dishes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.