2021
DOI: 10.1111/joop.12347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nudging flow through ‘SMART’ goal setting to decrease stress, increase engagement, and increase performance at work

Abstract: The construct of flow has been associated with a plethora of positive work outcomes such as performance, engagement, and reduced burnout. However, flow is understudied in the domain of work and there is a lack of empirical examinations of flow interventions. Additionally, until recently, the vast majority of research examining flow at work assumes that individuals are passive agents who only experience flow when their working conditions facilitate the state. Therefore, the study tested a ‘SMART’ goal‐setting n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, self-goal setting had significant relationships with both social expansion and work organization at the within- and between levels, as well as the indirect relationships already discussed. These findings provide further support for the robustness of goal-setting theory ( Locke and Latham, 1990 ) for driving positive work outcomes such as work engagement ( Weintraub et al, 2021 ). These results support the notion that self-goal setting can help sustain more fluid variables such as work engagement by providing the self-motivation and self-direction needed to facilitate behaviors that may be necessary yet undesirable to accomplish work tasks ( Bakker and van Woerkom, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, self-goal setting had significant relationships with both social expansion and work organization at the within- and between levels, as well as the indirect relationships already discussed. These findings provide further support for the robustness of goal-setting theory ( Locke and Latham, 1990 ) for driving positive work outcomes such as work engagement ( Weintraub et al, 2021 ). These results support the notion that self-goal setting can help sustain more fluid variables such as work engagement by providing the self-motivation and self-direction needed to facilitate behaviors that may be necessary yet undesirable to accomplish work tasks ( Bakker and van Woerkom, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, with regard to rewards, some workers may have been providing big, expensive rewards for themselves while others may have rewarded themselves with smaller things, or even with different categories of rewards (i.e., monetary rewards vs. allowing themselves to eat a treat they enjoy vs. giving themselves time to relax). Likewise, the content of goals has been shown in previous research to have differential effects on downstream variables such as work engagement ( Weintraub et al, 2021 ). Therefore, future research should aim to utilize a mixed-methods approach in which quantitative and qualitative aspects of goals and rewards can be further examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, short-term and long-term goals are usually set by coaches with the aim of achieving success for their teams (Burgess and Naughton, 2010 ; Paradis and Martin, 2012 ). However, coaches' inability to explicitly set specific, measurable, attainable, realistic and time-bound goals may put a significant burden on them (Nicholls et al, 2016 ; Weintraub et al, 2021 ). Additionally, players who seem not to have developed after several training sessions or achieved their personal goals for their upcoming competitions due to time limitations, injury or biological capabilities may be dropped in matches or competitions until they prove otherwise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the delivery of a digital stimulus to engage individuals in a specific task is an important component of digital interventions. These digital stimuli may include “nudges” (Valle et al, 2020; Weintraub et al, 2021), which Thaler and Sunstein (2021) define as a subtle intervention designed to modify people’s behavior “without forbidding any options or significantly changing economic incentives.” Nudges can take various forms, such as text reminders (e.g., to take a walk), graphic warnings (e.g., about the impact of sedentarism), or making a specific option salient (e.g., highlighting the presence of a park nearby). However, digital stimuli used to promote engagement in digital interventions are not limited to nudges.…”
Section: Engagement In Digital Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%