2022
DOI: 10.1002/exp.20220013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleus‐specific RNAi nanoplatform for targeted regulation of nuclear lncRNA function and effective cancer therapy

Abstract: In the context of cancer therapy, a recently identified therapeutic target is represented by the essential subtype of RNA transcripts ‐ the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA). While this is the case, it is especially difficult to successfully regulate the expression of this subtype in vivo, particularly due to the protection granted by the nuclear envelope of nuclear lncRNAs. This study documents the development of a nucleus‐specific RNA interference (RNAi) nanoparticle (NP) platform for the targeted regulation of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this formulation, the lipophilic triphenylphosphonium cation (TPP + ) group and oligoarginine sequence (RRRRRR) of MMPA could respectively accumulate in the mitochondrial matrix and penetrate the mitochondrial membrane, [ 24,25 ] while the polymer Meo‐PEG‐ b ‐PDPA with a p K a (≈6.34, Figure S4, Supporting Information) close to the endosomal pH (6.0–6.5) could spontaneously self‐assemble into well‐defined NPs in aqueous solution with hydrophilic PEG shells and hydrophobic PDPA cores. [ 26,27 ] During the formation of siRNA‐loaded NPs, the cationic peptide MMPA could form complexes with negatively charged siRNA with the hydrophobic alkyl chain of MMPA localized on surface of MMPA/siRNA complexes, which could be then embedded into the hydrophobic PDPA core of NPs via the co‐assembly with the amphiphilic polymer Meo‐PEG‐ b ‐PDPA (Scheme 1). [ 17,24,27 ] Through changing the feed compositions of MMPA and siRNA to adjust the N/P molar ratio (Figure S5, Supporting Information), the spherical siRNA‐loaded NPs formulated at an N/P molar ratio of 20/1 (denoted MT‐NPs(siATP6)) were chosen for the following experiments due to their relatively small size (≈85 n m , Figure A,B), high siRNA encapsulation efficiency (≈85%), moderate surface charge (≈9 mV), and good stability (Figures S5, S6, Supporting Information) compared to other NPs prepared at different N/P molar ratios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this formulation, the lipophilic triphenylphosphonium cation (TPP + ) group and oligoarginine sequence (RRRRRR) of MMPA could respectively accumulate in the mitochondrial matrix and penetrate the mitochondrial membrane, [ 24,25 ] while the polymer Meo‐PEG‐ b ‐PDPA with a p K a (≈6.34, Figure S4, Supporting Information) close to the endosomal pH (6.0–6.5) could spontaneously self‐assemble into well‐defined NPs in aqueous solution with hydrophilic PEG shells and hydrophobic PDPA cores. [ 26,27 ] During the formation of siRNA‐loaded NPs, the cationic peptide MMPA could form complexes with negatively charged siRNA with the hydrophobic alkyl chain of MMPA localized on surface of MMPA/siRNA complexes, which could be then embedded into the hydrophobic PDPA core of NPs via the co‐assembly with the amphiphilic polymer Meo‐PEG‐ b ‐PDPA (Scheme 1). [ 17,24,27 ] Through changing the feed compositions of MMPA and siRNA to adjust the N/P molar ratio (Figure S5, Supporting Information), the spherical siRNA‐loaded NPs formulated at an N/P molar ratio of 20/1 (denoted MT‐NPs(siATP6)) were chosen for the following experiments due to their relatively small size (≈85 n m , Figure A,B), high siRNA encapsulation efficiency (≈85%), moderate surface charge (≈9 mV), and good stability (Figures S5, S6, Supporting Information) compared to other NPs prepared at different N/P molar ratios.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26,27 ] During the formation of siRNA‐loaded NPs, the cationic peptide MMPA could form complexes with negatively charged siRNA with the hydrophobic alkyl chain of MMPA localized on surface of MMPA/siRNA complexes, which could be then embedded into the hydrophobic PDPA core of NPs via the co‐assembly with the amphiphilic polymer Meo‐PEG‐ b ‐PDPA (Scheme 1). [ 17,24,27 ] Through changing the feed compositions of MMPA and siRNA to adjust the N/P molar ratio (Figure S5, Supporting Information), the spherical siRNA‐loaded NPs formulated at an N/P molar ratio of 20/1 (denoted MT‐NPs(siATP6)) were chosen for the following experiments due to their relatively small size (≈85 n m , Figure A,B), high siRNA encapsulation efficiency (≈85%), moderate surface charge (≈9 mV), and good stability (Figures S5, S6, Supporting Information) compared to other NPs prepared at different N/P molar ratios. For these NPs, the protonation of their hydrophobic PDPA cores at a pH close to the endosomal pH (e.g., pH 6.0) could induce the disassociation of nanostructure and exposure of MMPA/siRNA complexes (Figure 1C), leading to the decrease in the number of NPs (Figure 1D) and fast siRNA release (Figure 1E).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given this limitation, there is an urgent need to develop alternative clinically available delivery systems for siRNA therapy. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Previously, we utilized a poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(D,Llactide) and cationic lipid combination to encapsulate siRNA, [19][20][21][22][23] employing a double emulsion-solvent evaporation technique. This approach yielded exceptional siRNA loading efficiency, exceeding 95%, owing to its nanoconfined loading mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%