1991
DOI: 10.1093/nar/19.4.885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleotides in precursor tRNAs that are required intact for catalysis by RNase P RNAs

Abstract: Precursor tRNAAsp molecules, containing a 26-base 5' leader, were treated with diethylpyrocarbonate, 50% hydrazine or anhydrous hydrazine/3M NaCl and then subjected to processing by RNase P RNAs from Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis. Fully processed tRNAs and material not successfully cleaved by the catalytic RNAs were analyzed for their content of chemically altered nucleotides. Several bases were identified as being required intact for optimal activity as substrate as judged by exclusion of chemically m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the enzymes from HeLa (Yuan and Altman, 1994, 199.5) and Xenopus nuclei (Carrara et al, 1995) tolerate alterations of the substrate structure, including disruption or deletion of D-stem and anticodon-stem domains, as long as the acceptorstem and T-loop remain unchanged. The requirement of eukaryotic RNases P for an intact, contiguous acceptor-stem and Tstem helix terminating with the correct T-loop sequence implies that the conserved T-loop might bind to the enzyme and thus aid in the correct positioning of the cleavage site, as has been postulated for E. coli RNase P (Kahle et al, 1990;Thurlow et al, 1991). Compared to the more relaxed specificity of the vertebrate enzymes, the substrate recognition by plant RNase P thus seems to be more strictly confined to the conserved three-dimensional pre-tRNA structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, the enzymes from HeLa (Yuan and Altman, 1994, 199.5) and Xenopus nuclei (Carrara et al, 1995) tolerate alterations of the substrate structure, including disruption or deletion of D-stem and anticodon-stem domains, as long as the acceptorstem and T-loop remain unchanged. The requirement of eukaryotic RNases P for an intact, contiguous acceptor-stem and Tstem helix terminating with the correct T-loop sequence implies that the conserved T-loop might bind to the enzyme and thus aid in the correct positioning of the cleavage site, as has been postulated for E. coli RNase P (Kahle et al, 1990;Thurlow et al, 1991). Compared to the more relaxed specificity of the vertebrate enzymes, the substrate recognition by plant RNase P thus seems to be more strictly confined to the conserved three-dimensional pre-tRNA structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In all organisms studied so far, the 5Ј leader of a tRNA precursor is removed by the site-specific RNase P, which cleaves precisely at the 5Ј end of the mature tRNA (for a review, see e.g., reference 1). Structural studies have already indicated that (i) the conformation of the tRNA in the precursor is approximately the same as that in the final mature state and (ii) the correct cloverleaf folding and L-shaped threedimensional structure of the tRNA moiety in the precursor are essential for recognition and cleavage by RNase P. Two domains, one near the cleavage site at the 5Ј end of the tRNA and the other one in the T stem and loop, were shown to be important for the interaction between the eubacterial RNase P RNA and the tRNA precursor (36). The residue at position 4 was part of the 6 nt of the acceptor stem involved in this interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pre-tRNA recognition by bacterial RNase P The regions of precursor tRNA recognized by bacterial RNase P include the TCC stem-loop, D-loop, and the acceptor stem (McClain et al 1987;Green and Vold 1988;Kahle et al 1990;Thurlow et al 1991;Pan et al 1995;Pan 1997, 1998;Chen et al 1998); the 59-leader also plays a role in substrate recognition and substrate/product discrimination (Brannvall et al 1998;Crary et al 1998;Niranjanakumari et al 1998;Zahler et al 2003Zahler et al , 2005Rueda et al 2005;Pettersson and Kirsebom 2008;Cuzic-Feltens et al 2009). In addition, bacterial RNase P typically interacts with the 39-end RCCA sequence found in most bacterial pre-tRNA transcripts (Sprinzl and Vassilenko 2005), and the disruption of this interaction has a negative effect on the substrate cleavage in vitro, although it does not abolish it (Guerrier-Takada et al 1984;McClain et al 1987;Kirsebom and Svard 1994;LaGrandeur et al 1994;Oh and Pace 1994;Svard et al 1996;Oh et al 1998;Heide et al 1999;Busch et al 2000;.…”
Section: The Known Functions and Substrates Of Rnase P Rnase P Is A Mmentioning
confidence: 99%