Abstract:A transition-metal-free protocol capable of synthesizing diarylated aniline derivatives is reported. This method could be further employed to prepare aryl alkyl ethers. A wide range of thioethers, anilines, as well as alcohols were tolerated thanks to the mild reaction conditions. The strength of our method was demonstrated by performing a gram-scale reaction (20 mmol) followed by conversion of the nitrile group into synthetically useful aldehyde, ketone, and carboxylic acid.
“…However, only a few reports on the metal‐free transformations for the construction of C−O bond have been demonstrated in this field [3] . In 2018, Zhao and Wang group developed a t ‐BuOK‐promoted C(sp 2 )−S bond cleavage of cyano‐substituted aryl‐methyl thioethers and C−O bond formation to prepare aryl‐alkyl ethers, but with very limited thioether substrates (Figure 1a) [3a] . After that, the construction of C−O bond through the Cs 2 CO 3 ‐mediated C(sp 2 )−S bond cleavage of arylsulfonium salts was also reported by Wang and co‐workers, however, only substrates containing strong electron‐withdrawing groups could be applied in this strategy (Figure 1b) [3b] .…”
A metal-free C(sp 3 )À S bond cleavage of β-alkylthio carbonyl compounds in the presence of Selectfluor is described. This novel strategy realizes the CÀ S bond cleavage and subsequent CÀ O bond formation, providing a facile and efficient method to construct different important β-alkoxy carbonyl compounds with moderate to good yields and good functional groups tolerance. Moreover, our mechanistic studies also prove that two different mechanisms including the oxidant and thionium ion intermediate pathway may exist in this process.
“…However, only a few reports on the metal‐free transformations for the construction of C−O bond have been demonstrated in this field [3] . In 2018, Zhao and Wang group developed a t ‐BuOK‐promoted C(sp 2 )−S bond cleavage of cyano‐substituted aryl‐methyl thioethers and C−O bond formation to prepare aryl‐alkyl ethers, but with very limited thioether substrates (Figure 1a) [3a] . After that, the construction of C−O bond through the Cs 2 CO 3 ‐mediated C(sp 2 )−S bond cleavage of arylsulfonium salts was also reported by Wang and co‐workers, however, only substrates containing strong electron‐withdrawing groups could be applied in this strategy (Figure 1b) [3b] .…”
A metal-free C(sp 3 )À S bond cleavage of β-alkylthio carbonyl compounds in the presence of Selectfluor is described. This novel strategy realizes the CÀ S bond cleavage and subsequent CÀ O bond formation, providing a facile and efficient method to construct different important β-alkoxy carbonyl compounds with moderate to good yields and good functional groups tolerance. Moreover, our mechanistic studies also prove that two different mechanisms including the oxidant and thionium ion intermediate pathway may exist in this process.
“…In 2018, we reported an example of the nucleophilic amination of alkyl cyanoaryl thioethers 35 mediated by KHMDS (Scheme 9). 25 Although the nucleophilicity of ani-…”
Recently, intense efforts have been dedicated to the development of novel synthetic strategies to access aromatic amines due to their importance in the pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, materials, and natural product areas. Although numerous transition-metal-catalyzed C–N formation strategies have been described for the preparation of aromatic amines in the past few decades, complementary methods under transition-metal-free conditions are still required. We present the recent advances in the exploration of innovative amination approaches via C(sp2)–O/C(sp2)–S bond cleavage in this review.1 Introduction2 Stoichiometric Base-Promoted Amination3 Base-Catalyzed Amination4 Photoredox-Catalyzed Amination5 Acid-Promoted Amination6 Conclusion and Perspectives
“…Nucleophilic aromatic substitution (S N Ar) reactions have long been an important strategic tool for organic synthesis, enabling the direct arylation of nucleophilic substrates . Classically, S N Ar reactions operate on activated arenes 3 bearing strongly electron‐withdrawing functionality (EWG, Figure A) . While such reactions have great utility, such substituents are often not synthetically desirable and thus represent a significant limitation for this reaction class.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1,2] Classically,S N Ar reactions operate on activated arenes 3 bearing strongly electron-withdrawing functionality (EWG, Figure 1A). [3][4][5][6][7][8] While such reactions have great utility,s uch substituents are often not synthetically desirable and thus represent asignificant limitation for this reaction class.Onthe other hand, several reports have described S N Ar reactions with unactivated substrates 4 through the use of strong bases and high reaction temperatures. [9][10][11][12][13] Unfortunately,m any complex substrates are not compatible with such conditions, which thus precludes the broad adoption of these methods.As such, the development of S N Ar reactions that occur on unactivated substrates at ambient temperature without the need for strongly basic reagents has presented as ignificant challenge.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.