Protein Targeting, Transport, and Translocation 2002
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012200731-6.50015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleocytoplasmic Transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
154
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
3
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The partial nuclear localization of GFP is caused by bidirectional diffusion through the nuclear pore complex (von Arnim et al, 1998). The exclusion limit for this bidirectional diffusion has been estimated to 40 to 60 kD (Gorlich and Mattaj, 1996). The predicted size of the GFP-AtPER1 fusion protein of 52 kD underpasses the size exclusion limit, so we cannot exclude that the partial nuclear localization seen for GFP-AtPER1 is due to diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partial nuclear localization of GFP is caused by bidirectional diffusion through the nuclear pore complex (von Arnim et al, 1998). The exclusion limit for this bidirectional diffusion has been estimated to 40 to 60 kD (Gorlich and Mattaj, 1996). The predicted size of the GFP-AtPER1 fusion protein of 52 kD underpasses the size exclusion limit, so we cannot exclude that the partial nuclear localization seen for GFP-AtPER1 is due to diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NES is a short leucine-rich sequence motif that binds Crm-1 and is necessary to mediate active nuclear export (Gorlich and Mattaj, 1996). NES transport motifs regulate the intracellular localization of a variety of proteins (Xu and Massague, 2004).…”
Section: Role Of the Regulatory Domains For Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttlimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we tested the substrate proteins for their binding to importin-b, which is a key transporter that promotes transportation of cargo proteins across the p53 nuclear importation Q Li et al nuclear membrane (Gorlich and Mattaj, 1996). GST-pulldown showed that importin-b coprecipitated with the GST-p53BNLS-EGFP protein, but not GST-p53MNLS-EGFP (Figure 1d), suggesting that the lack of nuclear import activity of the monopartite p53 NLS is due to its inability to bind importin-b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two additional amino acids located 5 0 of the original NLSI were showed to be required to form a fully functional NLS, indicating that the p53 NLS was bipartite in nature (Liang and Clarke, 1999). Nuclear import is initialized by binding of importin-a/b complex, which mediates the docking of proteins at the nuclear pore complex (Gorlich and Mattaj, 1996). However, the mechanism that regulates the importin-mediated nuclear import is still poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%