2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2017.7950669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclei segmentation in histopathology images using deep neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
92
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this experiment, only Figure 9 shows the visual comparison between our algorithm and algorithm in [9] in terms of segmentation results. At last, we follow the same strategy in [21] to validate our method. The strategy is called leave-one-patient-out cross-validation.…”
Section: B Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this experiment, only Figure 9 shows the visual comparison between our algorithm and algorithm in [9] in terms of segmentation results. At last, we follow the same strategy in [21] to validate our method. The strategy is called leave-one-patient-out cross-validation.…”
Section: B Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current deep learning methods for nuclei segmentation usually need complex post-processing procedure to obtain the final nuclei boundries. Naylor [21] employs FCN to discriminate the nuclei from background and then applies the watershed method to split the nuclei. However the resulting boundaries are not accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, deep CNNs have emerged as powerful tools for various pathological image analysis tasks, such as * Work performed while interning at IBM Research -China. tissue classification [30,10], lesion detection [17,22], nuclei segmentation [38,50,26], etc. The superior performance of deep CNNs usually relies on large amounts of labeled training data [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in more industrial applications (see (Grigorescu et al, 2019)for an overview of autonomous driving) a large amount of training data can be collected relatively easily: see the cityscapes dataset (Cordts et al, 2016) (available at https://www.cityscapes-dataset.com/ ) of traffic video frames using a car and camera to record and potentially non-expert individuals to label the objects, clinical data is considerably more difficult, due to ethical constraints, and expensive to gather as expert annotation is required. Datasets available in the public domain such as BBBC (Ljosa et al, 2012) at https://data.broadinstitute.org/bbbc/ , TNBC (Naylor et al, 2017(Naylor et al, , 2019 or TCGA (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2008;Kumar et al, 2017) and detection challenges including ISBI (Coelho et al, 2009), Kaggle ( https://www.kaggle.com/ ), ImageNet (Russakovsky et al, 2015) etc. contribute to the development of genuinely useful DL methods; however, most of them lack heterogeneity of the covered domains and are limited in data size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%