2015
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleation of Fe-rich phosphates and carbonates on microbial cells and exopolymeric substances

Abstract: Although phosphate and carbonate are important constituents in ancient and modern environments, it is not yet clear their biogeochemical relationships and their mechanisms of formation. Microbially mediated carbonate formation has been widely studied whereas little is known about the formation of phosphate minerals. Here we report that a new bacterial strain, Tessarococcus lapidicaptus, isolated from the subsurface of Rio Tinto basin (Huelva, SW Spain), is capable of precipitating Fe-rich phosphate and carbona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with our results, formations of nanoglobules and nanoparticles have been reported for Ca and/or Mg carbonates [14,21,22] and for Fe carbonates and phosphates in culture experiments with different pure strains [33,34]. Demonstrating of formation of nanoglobules by a mix natural heterotrophic population together with the previous studies indicate that formation of nanoglobules and nanoparticles may not be specific to a microbial strain or activity of a particular microbial group as suggested earlier by Sanchez et al [34].…”
Section: Bacterial Nucleation and Carbonate Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with our results, formations of nanoglobules and nanoparticles have been reported for Ca and/or Mg carbonates [14,21,22] and for Fe carbonates and phosphates in culture experiments with different pure strains [33,34]. Demonstrating of formation of nanoglobules by a mix natural heterotrophic population together with the previous studies indicate that formation of nanoglobules and nanoparticles may not be specific to a microbial strain or activity of a particular microbial group as suggested earlier by Sanchez et al [34].…”
Section: Bacterial Nucleation and Carbonate Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Demonstrating of formation of nanoglobules by a mix natural heterotrophic population together with the previous studies indicate that formation of nanoglobules and nanoparticles may not be specific to a microbial strain or activity of a particular microbial group as suggested earlier by Sanchez et al [34]. Particularly, lack of precipitation in the control experiments (abiotic and with dead bacterial cells) confirm that active metabolism of halophilic bacteria is essential to induce formation of various carbonate minerals.…”
Section: Bacterial Nucleation and Carbonate Precipitationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its supply to primary producers in the euphotic zone depends on external fluxes (Manning et al, 1999;Zegeye et al, 2012) and internal recycling as a result of organic matter (OM) mineralization in both the water column and underlying sediments (Katsev et al, 2006;Hupfer and Lewandowski, 2008). Removal of P through burial in sediments depends partly on sorption to iron oxides (Wilson et al, 2010), and because iron oxides tend to dissolve under reducing conditions and long-term anoxia, phosphate burial is sensitive to the oxygenation state of the water column and water-sediment interface (Sapota et al, 2006;Rothe et al, 2015). In environments with high sulfate (SO 2− 4 ) concentrations and sufficient labile OM, microbial SO 2− 4 reduction usually leads to the formation of sulfides and eventually iron sulfides, which decrease Fe recycling and the formation of Fe (oxyhydr)oxides in the upper oxygenated sediments, and this in turn decreases the extent to which P is retained in the sediment (Roden and Edmonds, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are studies looking at crystal morphology and isotopic composition of modern and ancient siderites (Abdul Hadi & Astin, ; Allison & Pye, ; Baumann et al, ; Moore, Ferrell, & Aharon, ; Raiswell & Fisher, ; Wittkop et al, ), and separate studies trying to nucleate siderite biotically or abiotically in the laboratory (Köhler, Konhauser, Papineau, Bekker, & Kappler, ; Mortimer, Galsworthy, Bittrell, Wilmot, & Newton, ; Mortimer & Coleman, ; Sanchez‐Roman et al, ), there are few studies that couple the analysis of modern siderite to laboratory experiments trying to grow it. In the East Anglian salt marshes (particularly along the north Norfolk coast, in the salt marshes named Warham, Stiffkey, and Blakeney), there are large siderite concretions (up to 20 cm in diameter) found actively growing in the sediment (Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%