2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-7007(02)00040-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficients of pure halogenated refrigerants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kew and Cornwell [6], using R-141b in a tube with a length of 500 mm and inner diameters of 1.39 to 3.69 mm, showed that the Cooper [18] pool boiling correlation best predicted their experimental data. Better prediction using the Cooper [18] correlation is also shown in the Jung et al [21] study.…”
Section: Nucleate Boiling Contributionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Kew and Cornwell [6], using R-141b in a tube with a length of 500 mm and inner diameters of 1.39 to 3.69 mm, showed that the Cooper [18] pool boiling correlation best predicted their experimental data. Better prediction using the Cooper [18] correlation is also shown in the Jung et al [21] study.…”
Section: Nucleate Boiling Contributionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In addition, Eq. (1) with Ra = 0.6 lm predicted 75% of the experimental results of Jung et al [34] for halocarbon refrigerants on a plain tube without surface modifications to within ±4%, while Gorenflo [35], despite to the fact that no empirical constant was proposed for R32 and R125, predicted just 12% of the data of Jung et al [34] to within ±10%. Cooper [36] (without the multiplier of 1.7 suggested for circular copper tubes) gave a higher absolute average deviation of almost 20% from the data of Jung et al [34].…”
Section: Previous Studies (From 2000 Onward)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Kew and Cornwell (1997) and Jung et al (2003) showed that the Cooper (1984) pool boiling correlation best predicted their experimental data. Chen (1966) defined the nucleate boiling suppression factor, S, as a ratio of the mean superheat, T e , to the wall superheat, T sat .…”
Section: Heat Transfer Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 88%