1966
DOI: 10.1038/211828a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Variation between Diploid Angiosperms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar difference has also been found in Vicia, a closely related genus (Rees et al 1966). The evolution of the Lathyrus species studied was accompanied by a decrease in chromosome size and that L. crassipes is a derived species (klamt and Schifino-Wittmann 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A similar difference has also been found in Vicia, a closely related genus (Rees et al 1966). The evolution of the Lathyrus species studied was accompanied by a decrease in chromosome size and that L. crassipes is a derived species (klamt and Schifino-Wittmann 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The distinction matters not only in respect of the origin of change but also with respect to its genetic consequences. Lengthwise duplication of parts involves duplication of some loci, whereas variation in strandedness or polynemy involves duplication or replication of all loci (see Rees et al, 1966).…”
Section: Results (A) Nuclear Dna Variation In the Six Lolium Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they are valid we should expect, for one thing, the increased nuclear DNA in many, even if not all (cf. Rees et al, 1966), inbreeding species as compared with related outbreeders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, DNA content per cell, per nucleus or per chromosome has been examined in many species, revealing that there exists a considerable variation of DNA content within a family, genus or even species (Rees et al 1966;Chooi 1971;Bennett 1972;Price et al 1973 ;Furuta et al 1974;Price and Bachmann 1975). Though the mechanism of change in DNA content is not fully understood, the evolutionary significance of the change in DNA amount was pointed out by some investigators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%