2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6793-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear uncertainties in the determination of proton PDFs

Abstract: We show how theoretical uncertainties due to nuclear effects may be incorporated into global fits of proton parton distribution functions (PDFs) that include deep-inelastic scattering and Drell-Yan data on nuclear targets. We specifically consider the CHORUS, NuTeV and E605 data included in the NNPDF3.1 fit, which used Pb, Fe and Cu targets, respectively. We show that the additional uncertainty in the proton PDFs due to nuclear effects is small, as expected, and in particular that the effect on thed/ū ratio, t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(264 reference statements)
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with constraints from related processes such as gauge boson production at the Tevatron and the LHC, information provided by neutrino-induced charged current deep-inelastic scattering on heavy nuclear targets play a critical role in disentangling the proton's quark and antiquark distributions. However, given the current precision of proton PDF fits, neglecting the nuclear uncertainties associated with neutrino-nucleus scattering may not be well justified anymore [11], as opposed to the situation some years ago [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with constraints from related processes such as gauge boson production at the Tevatron and the LHC, information provided by neutrino-induced charged current deep-inelastic scattering on heavy nuclear targets play a critical role in disentangling the proton's quark and antiquark distributions. However, given the current precision of proton PDF fits, neglecting the nuclear uncertainties associated with neutrino-nucleus scattering may not be well justified anymore [11], as opposed to the situation some years ago [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MHOUs are routinely estimated by varying the arbitrary renormalization μ r and factorization μ f scales of perturbative computations [1], though alternative methods have also been proposed [6][7][8]. Our inclusion of the MHOU in a PDF fit involves two steps: first we establish how theoretical uncertainties can be included in such a fit through a covariance matrix [9,10], and then we find a way of computing and validating the covariance matrix associated with the MHOU using scale variations [11]. By producing variants of NNPDF3.1 which include the MHOU, we are then able to finally address the long-standing question of their impact on state-of-the-art PDF sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details of the implementation of the theory covariance matrix in PDF fits may be found in Refs. [9,10]. The choice of nuisance parameters Δ (k) i used in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these proceedings, we show how to use existing nuclear PDFs (nPDFs) to provide an estimate of nuclear uncertainties, and include them in future proton PDF fits within the Neural Network PDF (NNPDF) framework [4]. For a more detailed analysis, see [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%