1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02055341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear techniques applied to air particulate matter studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, it can be seen that for Br and Cl concentration obtained by PIXE were lower than the distribution by INAA. Loss of these elements was already observed and discussed by other authors and several possible explanations have been given [17]. Most likely these elements were volatized to a certain extend during the PIXE bombardment of the samples [16] [18,19,20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…3, it can be seen that for Br and Cl concentration obtained by PIXE were lower than the distribution by INAA. Loss of these elements was already observed and discussed by other authors and several possible explanations have been given [17]. Most likely these elements were volatized to a certain extend during the PIXE bombardment of the samples [16] [18,19,20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…TSPs were settled down on 125 mm cellulose filter (Whatman 41) [20]. For sample analysis and determination of trace elements, NAA method was used [21]. Based on this method, the samples were prepared for two groups, the elements with short half-life and long half-life [22].…”
Section: Sample Collection Preparation and Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case of PM-10/PM-2.5 filter samples, the non-destructive nature of the analytical techniques as well as their use of only fractions of the total sample, made the utilization of the first two approaches to quality assessment straightforward and evaluated results have been reported. 4 However, the analysis of CRMs had limited utility. Due to the general lack of reference materials similar to the actual samples taken, i.e., there exist only a small number of artificially spiked filter substrates and a few bulk samples with much larger sample sizes certified for use (e.g., SRM 1648), only 1NAA provided comprehensive data on a common biological CRM: SRM 1572, Citrus Leaves.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%