1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.2.1924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Structure Effects in (p,2nucleon) Reactions on the Separated Isotopes of Tellurium at 300 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is a decreasing cross section as S n decreases, i.e. moving towards the neutron dripline, consistent with what was observed for example in [14,34]. The second is an odd-even effect wherein even-Z (proton number) projectiles have a cross section consistently higher than the odd-Z projectiles for the same S n of the daughter nucleus.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The first is a decreasing cross section as S n decreases, i.e. moving towards the neutron dripline, consistent with what was observed for example in [14,34]. The second is an odd-even effect wherein even-Z (proton number) projectiles have a cross section consistently higher than the odd-Z projectiles for the same S n of the daughter nucleus.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The concept of a neutron skin thickness has been presented as a suitable explanation by Caretto and co-workers (38,39) for (p,pn) and (p,2p) cross section trends across a row of cadmium and tellurium iso topes. The "thin" neutron skin hypothesis has been discussed by Karol and Miller(40) in relation to the anomalously low T<i(p,pn) Ni cross section (30 mb at 0.4 GeV compared to a "normal" value of 60 mb).…”
Section: 12c Meutrori Skin Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these values are significantly lower than have been estimated, 1 they are still within the range expected on the basis of other (/>, 2p) cross sections. 14 The modification of cross sections may help clear up a long-standing discrepancy between fragmentation cross sections for 10 Be production from 16 0 targets as measured by mass spectrometry, 12 compared with those inferred by radiochemical measurements. 15 As we have pointed out elsewhere, 16 cosmic-ray workers have generally adopted the directly measured mass-spectrometer values 1 while those doing meteorite 17 and lunar sample 18 studies have proferred the larger radiochemical values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%