1997
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.56.4579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear sizes and the isotope shift

Abstract: Darwin-Foldy nuclear-size corrections in electronic atoms and nuclear radii are discussed from the nuclearphysics perspective. The interpretation of precise isotope-shift measurements is formalism dependent, and care must be exercised in interpreting these results and those obtained from relativistic electron scattering from nuclei. We strongly advocate that the entire nuclear-charge operator be used in calculating nuclear-size corrections in atoms rather than relegating portions of it to the nonradiative reco… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
162
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
8
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis was further improved in [329] where also the virtual excitations of the deuteron in the electron-deuteron scattering were considered. Now the values of the deuteron matter radius extracted from the low energy nucleon-nucleon interaction [163] and from the low energy elastic electrondeuteron scattering [189,329] are in agreement, and do not contradict the optical data in eq. (400), eq.(401).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This analysis was further improved in [329] where also the virtual excitations of the deuteron in the electron-deuteron scattering were considered. Now the values of the deuteron matter radius extracted from the low energy nucleon-nucleon interaction [163] and from the low energy elastic electrondeuteron scattering [189,329] are in agreement, and do not contradict the optical data in eq. (400), eq.(401).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This means that calculating this correction we will treat the nucleus as a particle which interacts with the photons via its nontrivial Sachs electric and magnetic form factors in eq. (163). As usual we start consideration of the contributions of order (Zα)E F with the infrared divergent integral eq.…”
Section: XXXIVmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n was used, which takes into account contributions from the mean-square charge radii of the proton and neutron (with R 2 p = 0.769(12) fm 2 and R 2 n = −0.1161(22) fm 2 [13]) and the Darwin-Foldy term 3 4M 2 p = 0.033 fm 2 [14]. The effects of nuclear spin-orbit interaction and meson exchange currents, expected to be on the order of or below the experimental uncertainties, are not taken into account and will require further theoretical investigation.…”
Section: The Mass Shift δν Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15]). Minimal nonlocality fixes the representation, eliminates off-shell ambiguities, and specifies the form of the dominant part of the potential (such as OPEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%