1976
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-8165(76)80098-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Size and Chromatin Concentration in Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Human Urinary Bladder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with a previous study in which DNA, nuclear proteins and nuclear size increased in malignant cells [20,21,22,23]. Enlarged nuclei due to reactive changes may also appear in RM, with a small number of focus layers and few 3-dimensional properties (fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results are consistent with a previous study in which DNA, nuclear proteins and nuclear size increased in malignant cells [20,21,22,23]. Enlarged nuclei due to reactive changes may also appear in RM, with a small number of focus layers and few 3-dimensional properties (fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…MM nuclei showed more 3D structures than RM nuclei (mean number of focus layers, 5.4 vs. 4.4), with the mean nuclear size being 1.7 times larger than that of RM. These results are consistent with the observation that DNA and nucleoprotein increase in cancer cells, resulting in enlarged nuclei [26,27,28,29]. In addition, the steric alterations in nuclear luminance (×10 –3 ) were smaller for MM (4.9 ± 3.6) than RM (10.7 ± 7.5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results show that there is good correlation between the grade of malignancy and the DNA distribution pattern in urothelial bladder cancer (Levi et al, 1969;Fossa and Kaalhus, 1976 ; Tribukait et al, 1979; Gustafson et al, 1982a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One of the most valuable aims of the method used, therefore, is the possibility of standardisation of histological grading. Fossa and Kaalhus (1976) used the same grading system (Bergkvist et al, 1965), and this represents a clearly defined schedule. However, there seems to be a marked difference between the grading method used by Fossa and Kaalhus (1976) and that used in our histopathological laboratory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation