2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Protein-Only Ribonuclease P2 Structure and Biochemical Characterization Provide Insight into the Conserved Properties of tRNA 5′ End Processing Enzymes

Abstract: Protein-only RNase Ps (PRORPs) are a recently discovered class of RNA processing enzymes that catalyze maturation of the 5′ end of precursor tRNAs (pre-tRNAs) in Eukaryotes. PRORPs are found in the nucleus and/or organelles of most eukaryotic organisms. Arabidopsis thaliana is a representative organism that contains PRORP enzymes (PRORP1, PRORP2, PRORP3) in both its nucleus and organelles; PRORP2 and 3 localize to the nucleus, PRORP1 to the chloroplast and the mitochondria. Apart from their identification, alm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, PRORP enzymes do not share a major determinant of molecular recognition utilized by bacterial RNase P. Furthermore, PRORP1 and B. subtilis RNase P bind mature tRNA ∼30-and 400-fold weaker than pre-tRNA (leader length ≥ 4 nts), respectively . This is consistent with PRORP1 making fewer interactions with the leader than B. subtilis RNase P. Similar to PRORP1, recent binding studies with A. thaliana nuclear pre-tRNA Gly suggest PRORP2 does not require long leader (≤8 nt) and trailer (1 nt) lengths for tight binding (Karasik et al 2016). PRORPs efficiently catalyze removal of leader sequences from CysMito tRNA lacking an anti-codon stem-loop (ΔAC) but not from a model substrate lacking the anticodon stemloop and D-arm (SL substrate).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, PRORP enzymes do not share a major determinant of molecular recognition utilized by bacterial RNase P. Furthermore, PRORP1 and B. subtilis RNase P bind mature tRNA ∼30-and 400-fold weaker than pre-tRNA (leader length ≥ 4 nts), respectively . This is consistent with PRORP1 making fewer interactions with the leader than B. subtilis RNase P. Similar to PRORP1, recent binding studies with A. thaliana nuclear pre-tRNA Gly suggest PRORP2 does not require long leader (≤8 nt) and trailer (1 nt) lengths for tight binding (Karasik et al 2016). PRORPs efficiently catalyze removal of leader sequences from CysMito tRNA lacking an anti-codon stem-loop (ΔAC) but not from a model substrate lacking the anticodon stemloop and D-arm (SL substrate).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, full-length PRORP2 expressed in E. coli is observed mainly in the soluble fraction. A Δ20 amino acid truncation of PRORP2 at the N-terminus (the comparable truncation to Δ76 PRORP1) has comparable activity to full-length PRORP2 (Karasik et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-metazoan eukaryotes, the MRPP3-homologous PRORP enzymes are stand-alone proteins able to cleave a wide variety of substrates from different organisms (Gobert et al 2010;Karasik et al 2016;Howard, Klemm, and Fierke 2015). To gain insight into potential differences as to how single-protein PRORPs and complex-forming MRPP3 enzymes select and cleave their substrates we assessed the ability of A. thaliana PRORP1 and PRORP2 to recognize and process human (mt)pre-tRNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial steps for protein expression and purification, including nickel column purification, histidine tag and TEV removal are identical to those detailed above for Δ95MRPP3, with the following exceptions: the antibiotic used was streptomycin (50 µg/ml) and 10% glycerol was added to each Therefore, protein concentration was measured based on molecular weight and extinction coefficient values of 149 kDa and 79520 cm -1 mol -1 . A. thaliana PRORP1 and PRORP2 were expressed and purified from E. coli as previously described (Howard et al 2012;Karasik et al 2016). MRPP3 in cleavage reaction buffer were added to 20 nM fluorescently labeled pre-tRNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation