Nuclear Power and Nuclear Bombs

Abstract

The INK>: siiicly w;is l>ul~!i.*>h~:d in tight volur~ics iii I-'!;btiiary ! W O b y tlic I~itrr~iuttio~ial 8\f(t3i¥si E~1 < : r~~ Agency. cri~iqt~ss of the c(dIi-i[x! of (tie E970 77 a. policy iniiiaiivch, ¥-' '~A .~I < ,~+ "A ~Icvw,. of Recent Efforts to Haii the Sarcad u f NucIc;ir I.Vrdpws: I~s t ' o n s for F a~f~~r c~, 3 ' $yl-,r~s~.ril)t,,J;i~li!;~ty 25, "Ha, dv'tilfibic f r~i i i

Apples and horned toads: On the framework-determined nature of the energy debate

“…See also Schurr et al (1979), Chapter 24. 16 For another exchange, dealing more with the debate over nuclear proliferation, see Lovins, et al, 1980aLovins, et al, , 1980bWolfe, 1980;deLeon, 1980. …”

Union of Concerned Scientists

“…ABC 93 After the attacks on the US September 11, 2001, at least seven states deployed national guard troops to secure nuclear reactor perimeters (Hebert 2001). In some cases, this continued 94 See Lovins et al (1980) for an early exposition of this linkage.…”

Halting Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Initiatives To Stop Vertical and Horizontal Proliferation

“…Such a ban was proposed in 1958 by then 14,1946, Bernard M. Baruch presented an American proposal to the United Nations calling for the international control of atomic energy. According to this plan, all activities involving fissionable materials would be controlled by an international body whose monopoly would prevent any nation from possessing nuclear weapons.…”

“…(13) The report, describing the Baruch Plan, is sometimes referred to as the Acheson-Lilienthal report. (14) The Baruch Plan was rejected by the Soviet Union on June 19, 1946 on grounds the United States had a nuclear monopoly with its knowledge and experience of using nuclear weapons against the Japanese. This is no longer the case.…”