1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(97)00614-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear moments for the neutrinoless double beta decay

Abstract: The recently developed formalism for the evaluation of nuclear form factors in neutrinoless double beta decay is applied to 48 Ca, 76 Ge, 82 Se, 100 Mo, 128 T e and 130 T e nuclei. Explicit analytical expressions that follows from this theoretical development, in the single mode model for the decay of 48 Ca, have been worked out. They are useful both for testing the full numerical calculations, and for analytically checking the consistency with other formalisms. Large configuration space calculations are compa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the physical substratum is the same as in our previous QRPA work on the same issue [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28], and here we just bring up to date those studies. To implement this, we have to take into account the pseudoscalar (P ) and weak-magnetism (M ) matrix elements M 0ν P , and M 0ν M , as suggested byŠimkovic et al [29] (see also [30,Appendix A]), which we have not done before, i.e., we consider now the full nuclear weak current…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the physical substratum is the same as in our previous QRPA work on the same issue [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][25][26][27][28], and here we just bring up to date those studies. To implement this, we have to take into account the pseudoscalar (P ) and weak-magnetism (M ) matrix elements M 0ν P , and M 0ν M , as suggested byŠimkovic et al [29] (see also [30,Appendix A]), which we have not done before, i.e., we consider now the full nuclear weak current…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solve the RPA equations only once for the intermediate (N −1, Z +1) nucleus [23][24][25][26][27], while it is usually solved twice for (N, Z) and (N − 2, Z + 2) nuclei, followed by some kind of averaging procedure. This is an outstanding difference since, as shown bellow, the one-QRPA method yields significantly smaller ββ 0ν moments than the currently used two-QRPA-method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of such a code, including the three decay modes, demands an amazing effort both theoretically and numerically. Much effort has been spent by our group along last years in order to estimate the NME and the corresponding half-lives [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. From the pioneering works of Krmpotić et al [1], we decided to use in those works individual codes separated in three groups according to the considered decay mode.…”
Section: Results and Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,5,6]. Relative to the QRPA nuclear calculations, we have employed a residual δ -force V = −4π(v s P s + v t P t )δ (r), with different strength constants v s and v t for the particle-hole, particle-particle and pairing channels [1,3,11].…”
Section: Results and Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation