Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1134/s0026893310030027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
2
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
2
33
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…20 We found a very slight increase in coverage deviation in autosomes with higher nuclear mtDNA segment content, but these are not sufficient to account for the large observed differences between LCLs and controls, and among autosomes.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…20 We found a very slight increase in coverage deviation in autosomes with higher nuclear mtDNA segment content, but these are not sufficient to account for the large observed differences between LCLs and controls, and among autosomes.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…All 786 sequences analyzed contained 267 polymorphic sites, 181 of which were phylogenetically informative, and 309 haplotypes were identified. No nuclear mitochondrial DNA segments (numts) [70, 71] were found. PCR amplifications always produced only one band and we found no ambiguities in the sequences obtained–there were no unexpected stop codons, deletions, insertions or changes in the reading frame; all sequences were in concordance with the rest of cyt b sequences of the common vole from GenBank.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon would have resembled nuclear inserts of mitogenomes, which are frequent in eukaryotic chromosomes (for nuclear mitochondrial DNA segments, see Refs. [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95].…”
Section: Focus On Poxviridae: Synteny Between Poxviral and Amoeban MImentioning
confidence: 99%