2002
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.3.472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin-Spin Relaxation of the Crystals of Bone, Dental Enamel, and Synthetic Hydroxyapatites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
128
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(28 reference statements)
6
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, models of osteoporosis [44] and osteoporotic tissues in humans [45,46] are characterized by a decreased mineral/matrix ratio. No significant disparities ( p > 0.05) were observed between the two sex groups regarding the degree of mineralization, confirming previous studies [47] that are also related to the Ca/P ratio as a critical mineralization biomarker [48,49]. Trabecular bone apatite, represented by rib samples, shows decreased mineral deposited in the bone matrix in a highly significant manner ( p = 0.0002) compared to the compact sections.…”
Section: Band Analysis and Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In general, models of osteoporosis [44] and osteoporotic tissues in humans [45,46] are characterized by a decreased mineral/matrix ratio. No significant disparities ( p > 0.05) were observed between the two sex groups regarding the degree of mineralization, confirming previous studies [47] that are also related to the Ca/P ratio as a critical mineralization biomarker [48,49]. Trabecular bone apatite, represented by rib samples, shows decreased mineral deposited in the bone matrix in a highly significant manner ( p = 0.0002) compared to the compact sections.…”
Section: Band Analysis and Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…While both NMR and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used to characterize bone in a number of studies [40,45,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56], the present work is the first to quantify water distribution in bone for two age groups. A previous study had actually characterized water distribution in dentin samples from a 20 year, 35 year, and 50 year old donor [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 18 male donors had no known bone disease. Based on donor age, the femurs were divided into two groups: middle aged included 8 ages of 47,49,49,51,55,57,59, and 59 years, while the elderly included 10 ages of 67, 69, 76, 76, 77, 77, 79, 79, 81, and 87 years. Cut from the medial quadrant of each mid-diaphysis, a longitudinal strip of bone was machined, while maintaining hydration, into a standard paralellelepiped specimen such that the osteons ran in the direction of the long axis.…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently accepted model of bone mineral is ∼50-to 150-nmthick stacks of very closely packed apatitic platelets, each of order 2.5-4 nm in thickness (1)(2)(3)(4), arranged so that their large (100) faces are parallel to each other and their c axes are strongly ordered (parallel to collagen fibrils) (5). NMR studies show that, in addition to the largely ordered but nonstoichiometric apatitic phase, there is a substantial, highly hydrated, disordered phase containing up to 55% of the bone mineral phosphatic ions (6,7) but in the form of hydrogen phosphate or phosphate strongly hydrogen-bonded to water rather than apatitic orthophosphate (8). This phase has been assigned as a surface phase, but whether the surface in question is that of individual mineral platelets or the surface of the overall structure formed by a stack of such platelets is not yet clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%