1984
DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90077-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: Contrast-to-noise ratio as a function of strength of magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative SNR values of the antenna arrays were numerically calculated by combining the normalized receive B 1 ( normalB1) distributions of individual antenna elements in a root sum‐of‐squares (RSOS) fashion and scaling with the square of B 0 to account for the field‐strength related increase in signal power : SNRrelative (normalB07.0)2.truen=110(|normalB1,n|normalPnormaln)2 where B 0 is the field strength, |normalB1,n|normalPnormaln is the magnitude of the receive B 1 field normalized to 1 W of accepted power for the n th antenna element.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative SNR values of the antenna arrays were numerically calculated by combining the normalized receive B 1 ( normalB1) distributions of individual antenna elements in a root sum‐of‐squares (RSOS) fashion and scaling with the square of B 0 to account for the field‐strength related increase in signal power : SNRrelative (normalB07.0)2.truen=110(|normalB1,n|normalPnormaln)2 where B 0 is the field strength, |normalB1,n|normalPnormaln is the magnitude of the receive B 1 field normalized to 1 W of accepted power for the n th antenna element.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a paramagnetic contrast agent is introduced and accumulates in the tissue of interest, it produces changes in the spin-lattice relaxation (T 1 contrast) and/or the spin-spin relaxation (T 2 contrast) dynamics of protons in nearby water molecules. 147,148 This change allows one to differentiate the tissue of interest from others. Contrast agents are called either T 1 or T 2 agents, depending on whether the relative change in relaxation times is greater for T 1 or T 2 .…”
Section: Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For microscopy in a well‐designed spectrometer, the principal source of noise is the RF coil rather than the sample, as contrasted with conventional imaging. As a result, SNR is expected to scale more nearly as ω 7/4 (where ω is the Larmor frequency) for microscopy studies as compared with scaling as ω for conventional imaging studies (17). Thus, an increase in magnetic field strength from 4.7T as used here to 18.8T—readily achievable with commercially available NMR magnets—would allow voxel size to be decreased from (60 μm) 3 to (38 μm) 3 with no penalty in image acquisition time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%