2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Dipolar Cross-Relaxation Interaction between Nanoconfined Fluids and Matrix Solids

Abstract: Many different methods have been developed to investigate fluid–solid interactions in nanoporous systems. These methods either only work in the liquid phase or provide an indirect measurement by probing the fluid–solid interaction based on a measured property change of the fluid or solid under different sample conditions. Here, we report a direct measurement technique using NMR dipolar cross-relaxation between the nanoconfined fluids and the matrix solids. The method was tested using a methyl-functionalized me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fast-motion (i.e., low-frequency) regime, the simulations would normally predict that T 2 ≃ T 1 lies on the 1–1 diagonal of the 2D map, which is clearly not consistent with T 2 measurements for dissolved heptane in Figure . Similar inadequacies in T 2 have also been noted in other nanoconfined systems. , Upon reflection, we can infer that in contrast to the bulk there is anisotropy in the system originating from tight confinement and strong solid/fluid interactions, leading to additional dephasing (i.e., transverse relaxation) in T 2 . This residual dipolar coupling (RDC) has been hypothesized to play an important role in organic-rich shale. , The RDC is given by the following expression in units of (s –1 ), where r ij is the distance between 1 H dipoles i and j and θ ij is the angle the vector connecting the two dipoles makes with the external magnetic field.…”
Section: T 2 Residual Dipolar Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the fast-motion (i.e., low-frequency) regime, the simulations would normally predict that T 2 ≃ T 1 lies on the 1–1 diagonal of the 2D map, which is clearly not consistent with T 2 measurements for dissolved heptane in Figure . Similar inadequacies in T 2 have also been noted in other nanoconfined systems. , Upon reflection, we can infer that in contrast to the bulk there is anisotropy in the system originating from tight confinement and strong solid/fluid interactions, leading to additional dephasing (i.e., transverse relaxation) in T 2 . This residual dipolar coupling (RDC) has been hypothesized to play an important role in organic-rich shale. , The RDC is given by the following expression in units of (s –1 ), where r ij is the distance between 1 H dipoles i and j and θ ij is the angle the vector connecting the two dipoles makes with the external magnetic field.…”
Section: T 2 Residual Dipolar Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-relaxation has a tendency to average out and narrow the measured T 1 distribution from all 1 H in contact with each other, via spin diffusion (a.k.a. magnetization transfer). ,,,, In the present case, the 1 H-bearing molecules in contact with each other include intergranular heptane, dissolved heptane, bitumen, and kerogen. The cross-relaxation is evidenced experimentally by the narrower T 1 distribution compared to T 2 in Figure , which makes the pore-size distribution P ( d ) more accurate from T 2 than from T 1 .…”
Section: T 2 Residual Dipolar Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%