1982
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4622(82)85014-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion in monoclinic lysozyme crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with our 2 H dispersion (Fig. 5) and a previous 1 H dispersion from lysozyme crystals (Bryant et al, 1982), showing that R 1 remains frequency dependent up to 50 MHz at least. At the frequencies (9.2 and 38.7 MHz) of previous 2 H R 1 measurements, R 1 , must therefore include a contribution from motions with correlation times in the nanosecond range.…”
Section: Water Dynamics In Protein Crystalssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with our 2 H dispersion (Fig. 5) and a previous 1 H dispersion from lysozyme crystals (Bryant et al, 1982), showing that R 1 remains frequency dependent up to 50 MHz at least. At the frequencies (9.2 and 38.7 MHz) of previous 2 H R 1 measurements, R 1 , must therefore include a contribution from motions with correlation times in the nanosecond range.…”
Section: Water Dynamics In Protein Crystalssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because a low-frequency plateau is not evident, it would not be meaningful to fit a Lorentzian dispersion function to the data. Indeed, a previously reported water 1 H dispersion from monoclinic lysozyme crystals shows no tendency to level out, even at 10 kHz (Bryant et al, 1982). On the other hand, the R 1 , dispersion observed here is not just the high-frequency tail of a Lorentzian dispersion centered at lower frequency, because the observed frequency dependence is much weaker than inversesquare (cf.…”
Section: Magnetic Relaxation Dispersioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First systematic studies in this field are dating from the sixties [80]. The application of the technique for the study of water-protein interactions and dynamics in protein solutions is extensive up to the present day [92][93][94][95]. The water exchange process between bulk water and molecules trapped in the protein structure can be studied with FC relaxometry [96].…”
Section: Bio-molecules Containing Paramagnetic or Metallic Centers Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the case for 'yh-crystallin, for which these forms retain sufficient rotational mobility to contribute to the monotonic background of the NMRD profiles as do globular proteins, the a-crystallin particles appear sufficiently large, >5 x 104 kD, to be regarded as "microsolids," judging from their slowed rotation. The NMRD profiles become much like those of (irreversibly) immobilized protein (Lindstrom and Koenig, 1974;Bryant et al, 1982Bryant et al, , 1991Beaulieu, 1989;Koenig and Brown, 1991), which, in turn, appear to be models for the NMRD profiles of water protons of most tissue. Indeed, recent ideas on the distinctions between relaxation of water protons in protein solutions and in tissue indicate a transition from liquidto solid-like behavior for relaxation of the macromolecular protons (Koenig and Brown, 1991) that alters the solvent proton NMRD profiles through magnetization transfer across the protein-water interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%