2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09185-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear lamina integrity is required for proper spatial organization of chromatin in Drosophila

Abstract: How the nuclear lamina (NL) impacts on global chromatin architecture is poorly understood. Here, we show that NL disruption in Drosophila S2 cells leads to chromatin compaction and repositioning from the nuclear envelope. This increases the chromatin density in a fraction of topologically-associating domains (TADs) enriched in active chromatin and enhances interactions between active and inactive chromatin. Importantly, upon NL disruption the NL-associated TADs become more acetylated at histone H3 and less com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

24
176
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
24
176
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, variations in lamin A/C levels, induced by either its up-or down regulation, or as observed in laminopathy-associated mutations in lamin A/C, drive heterochromatin detachment from the nuclear lamina 13,14 . This was accompanied by chromatin de-condensation and reduced levels of HP1 and H3K9me3 repressive marks in mammals 15,16 , C. elegans 17 as well as in Drosophila cells 18,19 . Taken together, these findings suggested that LADs are specifically sensitive to the levels of lamin A/C at the nuclear lamina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, variations in lamin A/C levels, induced by either its up-or down regulation, or as observed in laminopathy-associated mutations in lamin A/C, drive heterochromatin detachment from the nuclear lamina 13,14 . This was accompanied by chromatin de-condensation and reduced levels of HP1 and H3K9me3 repressive marks in mammals 15,16 , C. elegans 17 as well as in Drosophila cells 18,19 . Taken together, these findings suggested that LADs are specifically sensitive to the levels of lamin A/C at the nuclear lamina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actively transcribed regions are spatially associated with nuclear pores or localized in the nuclear interior . Such spatial organization is considerably supported by the nuclear lamina, suggesting a significant role for the lamina in genome organization . Lamins are direct targets of CDKs , an interaction which results in their disassembly and solubilization during nuclear envelope breakdown at mitosis .…”
Section: Challenges Associated With Copying the Complex Epigenomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar formulation of domain growth terms as volume constraints in free energy has been used by Nonomura in applications of phase-field methods to multi-cellular growth models (41) and recently also by Lee et al (43) for mathematical modeling of chromocenter patterns of rods. Recent experiments and simulations have been shown that nuclear chromatin organization is highly correlated with integrity of chromatin-lamina scaffold (48,50), which regulates chromatin dynamics during development. To highlight the effect of nuclear shape dynamics on chromatin re-organization it is important to couple the nuclear shape dynamics with chromatin state variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the two-fluid fluctuating hydrodynamic model of chromatin (40), deterministic phase-field models of multi-cellular domain growth (41, 42) and its mathematical application to rod chromocenter patterning (43), mesoscale polymeric models of chromatin fiber (20-22) and active cellular mechanics models (44-47). We have applied MELON framework to model liquid-liquid phase separation driven reorganization of Drosophila melanogaster nucleus under different conditions which are characteristic for different cell phases (48,49): interphase, active remodeling phases, long-term senescence and nuclear inversion ( Fig 1A). Finally, we note that the generic nature of the MELON framework ( Fig 1B) along with the minimal physical assumptions that we have built into the model of Drosophila nucleus allows drawing broad inferences which should also hold for other eukaryotic nuclei.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%