Deep Space Propulsion 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0607-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear Fusion Propulsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Landis (1999) and Frisbee (2004) found ways to reduce it dramatically to 1-10 km. Systems were further optimized, with a higher peak power of ∼10 TW and a smaller vehicle size of ∼0.1-1 km for the sail, requiring a ∼100 km antenna array aperture (Dickinson 2001;Long 2011). Later concepts developed cost-optimized systems (Benford 2013).…”
Section: Starships: the Biggest And Grandest Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landis (1999) and Frisbee (2004) found ways to reduce it dramatically to 1-10 km. Systems were further optimized, with a higher peak power of ∼10 TW and a smaller vehicle size of ∼0.1-1 km for the sail, requiring a ∼100 km antenna array aperture (Dickinson 2001;Long 2011). Later concepts developed cost-optimized systems (Benford 2013).…”
Section: Starships: the Biggest And Grandest Missionsmentioning
confidence: 99%