2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear expression of a cytoplasmic male sterility gene modifies mitochondrial morphology in yeast and plant cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it is interesting to note that ORFH522 is reported to be lethal to bacterial cell (Nakai et al 1995). In the constructs, initially developed in pRT100 vector, CaMV 35S promoter was replaced with TA29 promoter for two reasons; one, 35S promoter is shown to effect a lower level expression in the male gametophyte in general and specifically in tapetal tissues of anther (Medberry et al 1992;Mc Cormick 2004;Duroc et al 2006) and two, to ensure formation of silencing trigger in the target tissue (tapetal cell layer) it was better to use the same promoter (TA29) employed in the male sterility inducing vector (Nizampatnam et al 2009) as has been the case in many of the other systems of transgenic male sterility and fertility restoration reported so far (Mariani et al 1992;Schmülling et al 1993;Zabaleta et al 1996;Busi et al 2006;Engelke et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it is interesting to note that ORFH522 is reported to be lethal to bacterial cell (Nakai et al 1995). In the constructs, initially developed in pRT100 vector, CaMV 35S promoter was replaced with TA29 promoter for two reasons; one, 35S promoter is shown to effect a lower level expression in the male gametophyte in general and specifically in tapetal tissues of anther (Medberry et al 1992;Mc Cormick 2004;Duroc et al 2006) and two, to ensure formation of silencing trigger in the target tissue (tapetal cell layer) it was better to use the same promoter (TA29) employed in the male sterility inducing vector (Nizampatnam et al 2009) as has been the case in many of the other systems of transgenic male sterility and fertility restoration reported so far (Mariani et al 1992;Schmülling et al 1993;Zabaleta et al 1996;Busi et al 2006;Engelke et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, genetic transformation of plant mitochondria is not yet technically feasible. Furthermore, we previously reported that in yeast, and most probably in plant cells, ORF138 does not correctly insert into the inner mitochondrial membrane when translated in the cytosol from a nuclear gene fusion with a mitochondrial targeting peptide sequence (Duroc et al 2006). Therefore, such approaches could not be undertaken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male sterile plants were obtained upon nuclear expression of the CMS-associated bean orf239 (He et al 1996), beet orf129 , chili pepper orf456 (Kim et al 2007), mustard orf220 , rice orf79 (Wang et al 2006) or wall-rocket orf108 (Kumar et al 2012). Conversely, similar attempts with the proteins associated with maize CMS-T, petunia CMS or radish and Brassica Ogura CMS failed to yield sterile plants (von Allmen et al 1991;Chaumont et al 1995;Wintz et al 1995;Duroc et al 2006). Also puzzling, in some cases, expression of the CMS orf resulted in aberrant pollen function and a semi-sterile or male-sterile phenotype regardless of the presence or not of an MTS (He et al 1996;Kumar et al 2012).…”
Section: Import Of Cms-associated Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this gene, fused to an MTS-encoding sequence, was expressed in tobacco from a nuclear transgene, the URF13 protein actually accumulated in mitochondria, but there was no correlation with a male sterile phenotype (Chaumont et al 1995). The lack of male sterility following nuclear expression of several CMS genes (von Allmen et al 1991;Chaumont et al 1995;Wintz et al 1995;Duroc et al 2006;) is not clearly understood. Inappropriate timing and/or spatial control of transgene expression is often put forward as an explanation.…”
Section: Import Of Cms-associated Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%